@article {393,
	title = {Two functions of the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli Rob: mediating "sequestration-dispersal" as a novel off-on switch for regulating Rob{\textquoteright}s activity as a transcription activator and preventing degradation of Rob by Lon protease.},
	journal = {J Mol Biol},
	volume = {388},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 May 8},
	pages = {415-30},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, Rob activates transcription of the SoxRS/MarA/Rob regulon. Previous work revealed that Rob resides in three to four immunostainable foci, that dipyridyl and bile salts are inducers of its activity, and that inducers bind to Rob{\textquoteright}s C-terminal domain (CTD). We propose that sequestration inactivates Rob by blocking its access to the transcriptional machinery and that inducers activate Rob by mediating its dispersal, allowing interaction with RNA polymerase. To test "sequestration-dispersal" as a new mechanism for regulating the activity of transcriptional activators, we fused Rob{\textquoteright}s CTD to SoxS and used indirect immunofluorescence microscopy to determine the effect of inducers on SoxS-Rob{\textquoteright}s cellular localization. Unlike native SoxS, which is uniformly distributed throughout the cell, SoxS-Rob is sequestered without an inducer, but is rapidly dispersed when cells are treated with an inducer. In this manner, Rob{\textquoteright}s CTD serves as an anti-sigma factor in regulating the co-sigma-factor-like activity of SoxS when fused to it. Rob{\textquoteright}s CTD also protects its N-terminus from Lon protease, since Lon{\textquoteright}s normally rapid degradation of SoxS is blocked in the chimera. Accordingly, Rob{\textquoteright}s CTD has novel regulatory properties that can be bestowed on another E. coli protein.},
	keywords = {Decanoic Acids, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Reporter, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Biological, Protease La, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Pyridines, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Trans-Activators, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1089-8638},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2009.03.023},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Fitzpatrick, M Megan and Keen, Edward F and Wolf, Richard E}
}
@article {814,
	title = {XthA (Exonuclease III) regulates loading of RecA onto DNA substrates in log phase Escherichia coli cells.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {67},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Jan},
	pages = {88-101},
	abstract = {Exonucleases can modify DNA substrates created during DNA replication, recombination and repair. In Escherichia coli, the effects of several 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} exonucleases on RecA loading were studied by assaying RecA-GFP foci formation. Mutations in xthA (ExoIII), xseAB (ExoVII), xni (ExoIX), exoX (ExoX) and tatD (ExoXI) increased the number of RecA-GFP foci twofold to threefold in a population of log phase cells grown in minimal medium. These increases depend on xonA. Epistasis analysis shows that ExoVII, ExoX, ExoIX and ExoXI function in a common pathway, distinct from ExoIII (and ExoI is upstream of both pathways). It is shown (paradoxically) that in xthA mutants, RecA-GFP loading is predominantly RecBCD-dependent and that xthA recB double mutants are viable. Experiments show that while log phase xthA cells have twofold more double-stranded breaks (DSBs) than wild type, they do not induce the SOS response. The increase in RecA loading is independent of the base excision repair (BER) proteins Nth, MutM and Nei. It is proposed that log phase cells produce DSBs that do not induce the SOS response. Furthermore, ExoI, ExoIII and the other 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} exonucleases process these DSBs, antagonizing the RecBCD pathway of RecA loading, thus regulating the availability of these substrates for recombination.},
	keywords = {DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, Epistasis, Genetic, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Microbial Viability, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06026.x},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Lestini, Roxane and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {35,
	title = {Multiple basic helix-loop-helix proteins regulate expression of the ENO1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.},
	journal = {Eukaryot Cell},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 May},
	pages = {786-96},
	abstract = {The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) eukaryotic transcription factors have the ability to form multiple dimer combinations. This property, together with limited DNA-binding specificity for the E box (CANNTG), makes them ideally suited for combinatorial control of gene expression. We tested the ability of all nine Saccharomyces cerevisiae bHLH proteins to regulate the enolase-encoding gene ENO1. ENO1 was known to be activated by the bHLH protein Sgc1p. Here we show that expression of an ENO1-lacZ reporter was also regulated by the other eight bHLH proteins, namely, Ino2p, Ino4p, Cbf1p, Rtg1p, Rtg3p, Pho4p, Hms1p, and Ygr290wp. ENO1-lacZ expression was also repressed by growth in inositol-choline-containing medium. Epistatic analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that regulation by Sgc1p, Ino2p, Ino4p, and Cbf1p and repression by inositol-choline required three distal E boxes, E1, E2, and E3. The pattern of bHLH binding to the three E boxes and experiments with two dominant-negative mutant alleles of INO4 and INO2 support the model that bHLH dimer selection affects ENO1-lacZ expression. These results support the general model that bHLH proteins can coordinate different biological pathways via multiple mechanisms.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, beta-Galactosidase, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, E-Box Elements, Epistasis, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Dominant, Models, Biological, Mutation, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins},
	issn = {1535-9778},
	doi = {10.1128/EC.00383-06},
	author = {Chen, Meng and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {817,
	title = {UvrD limits the number and intensities of RecA-green fluorescent protein structures in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {189},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Apr},
	pages = {2915-20},
	abstract = {RecA is important for recombination, DNA repair, and SOS induction. In Escherichia coli, RecBCD, RecFOR, and RecJQ prepare DNA substrates onto which RecA binds. UvrD is a 3{\textquoteright}-to-5{\textquoteright} helicase that participates in methyl-directed mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair. uvrD deletion mutants are sensitive to UV irradiation, hypermutable, and hyper-rec. In vitro, UvrD can dissociate RecA from single-stranded DNA. Other experiments suggest that UvrD removes RecA from DNA where it promotes unproductive reactions. To test if UvrD limits the number and/or the size of RecA-DNA structures in vivo, an uvrD mutation was combined with recA-gfp. This recA allele allows the number of RecA structures and the amount of RecA at these structures to be assayed in living cells. uvrD mutants show a threefold increase in the number of RecA-GFP foci, and these foci are, on average, nearly twofold higher in relative intensity. The increased number of RecA-green fluorescent protein foci in the uvrD mutant is dependent on recF, recO, recR, recJ, and recQ. The increase in average relative intensity is dependent on recO and recQ. These data support an in vivo role for UvrD in removing RecA from the DNA.},
	keywords = {DNA Helicases, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01777-06},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {40,
	title = {Genomic analysis of PIS1 gene expression.},
	journal = {Eukaryot Cell},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Mar},
	pages = {604-14},
	abstract = {The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PIS1 gene is essential and required for the final step in the de novo synthesis of phosphatidylinositol. Transcription of the PIS1 gene is uncoupled from the factors that regulate other yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes are regulated in response to inositol and choline via a regulatory circuit that includes the Ino2p:Ino4p activator complex and the Opi1p repressor. PIS1 is regulated in response to carbon source and anaerobic growth conditions. Both of these regulatory responses are modest, which is not entirely surprising since PIS1 is essential. However, even modest regulation of PIS1 expression has been shown to affect phosphatidylinositol metabolism and to affect cell cycle progression. This prompted the present study, which employed a genomic screen, database mining, and more traditional promoter analysis to identify genes that affect PIS1 expression. A screen of the viable yeast deletion set identified 120 genes that affect expression of a PIS1-lacZ reporter. The gene set included several peroxisomal genes, silencing genes, and transcription factors. Factors suggested by database mining, such as Pho2 and Yfl044c, were also found to affect PIS1-lacZ expression. A PIS1 promoter deletion study identified an upstream regulatory sequence element that was required for carbon source regulation located downstream of three previously defined upstream activation sequence elements. Collectively, these studies demonstrate how a collection of genomic and traditional strategies can be implemented to identify a set of genes that affect the regulation of an essential gene.},
	keywords = {Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Silencing, Genome, Fungal, Glycerol, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Peroxisomes, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transferases (Other Substituted Phosphate Groups)},
	issn = {1535-9778},
	doi = {10.1128/EC.4.3.604-614.2005},
	author = {Gardocki, Mary E and Bakewell, Margaret and Kamath, Deepa and Robinson, Kelly and Borovicka, Kathy and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {820,
	title = {Localization of RecA in Escherichia coli K-12 using RecA-GFP.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {57},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Aug},
	pages = {1074-85},
	abstract = {RecA is important in recombination, DNA repair and repair of replication forks. It functions through the production of a protein-DNA filament. To study the localization of RecA in live Escherichia coli cells, the RecA protein was fused to the green fluorescence protein (GFP). Strains with this gene have recombination/DNA repair activities three- to tenfold below wild type (or about 1000-fold above that of a recA null mutant). RecA-GFP cells have a background of green fluorescence punctuated with up to five foci per cell. Two types of foci have been defined: 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-sensitive foci that are bound to DNA and DAPI-insensitive foci that are DNA-less aggregates/storage structures. In log phase cells, foci were not localized to any particular region. After UV irradiation, the number of foci increased and they localized to the cell centre. This suggested colocalization with the DNA replication factory. recA, recB and recF strains showed phenotypes and distributions of foci consistent with the predicted effects of these mutations.},
	keywords = {Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Replication, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04755.x},
	author = {Renzette, Nicholas and Gumlaw, Nathan and Nordman, Jared T and Krieger, Marlee and Yeh, Su-Ping and Long, Edward and Centore, Richard and Boonsombat, Ruethairat and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {823,
	title = {Measurement of SOS expression in individual Escherichia coli K-12 cells using fluorescence microscopy.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {53},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Sep},
	pages = {1343-57},
	abstract = {Many recombination, DNA repair and DNA replication mutants have high basal levels of SOS expression as determined by a sulAp-lacZ reporter gene system on a population of cells. Two opposing models to explain how the SOS expression is distributed in these cells are: (i) the {\textquoteright}Uniform Expression Model (UEM){\textquoteright} where expression is evenly distributed in all cells or (ii) the {\textquoteright}Two Population Model (TPM){\textquoteright} where some cells are highly induced while others are not at all. To distinguish between these two models, a method to quantify SOS expression in individual bacterial cells was developed by fusing an SOS promoter (sulAp) to the green fluorescent protein (gfp) reporter gene and inserting it at attlambda on the Escherichia coli chromosome. It is shown that the fluorescence in sulAp-gfp cells is regulated by RecA and LexA. This system was then used to distinguish between the two models for several mutants. The patterns displayed by priA, dnaT, recG, uvrD, dam, ftsK, rnhA, polA and xerC mutants were explained best by the TPM while only lexA (def), lexA3 (ind-) and recA defective mutants were explained best by the UEM. These results are discussed in a context of how the processes of DNA replication and recombination may affect cells in a population differentially.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, DNA Damage, DNA Helicases, DNA Repair, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Reporter, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04225.x},
	author = {McCool, Jesse D and Long, Edward and Petrosino, Joseph F and Sandler, Hilary A and Rosenberg, Susan M and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {44,
	title = {A network of yeast basic helix-loop-helix interactions.},
	journal = {Nucleic Acids Res},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 Nov 15},
	pages = {4460-6},
	abstract = {The Ino4 protein belongs to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of proteins. It is known to form a dimer with Ino2p, which regulates phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Mammalian bHLH proteins have been shown to form multiple dimer combinations. However, this flexibility in dimerization had not been documented for yeast bHLH proteins. Using the yeast two-hybrid assay and a biochemical assay we show that Ino4p dimerizes with the Pho4p, Rtg1p, Rtg3p and Sgc1p bHLH proteins. Screening a yeast cDNA library identified three additional proteins that interact with Ino4p: Bck2p, YLR422W and YNR064C. The interaction with Bck2p prompted us to examine if any of the Bck2p-associated functions affect expression of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. We found that hyperosmotic growth conditions altered the growth phase regulation of a phospholipid biosynthetic gene, CHO1. There are two recent reports of initial whole genome yeast two-hybrid interactions. Interestingly, one of these reports identified five proteins that interact with Ino4p: Ino2p, Hcs1p, Apl2p, YMR317W and YNL279W. Ino2p is the only protein in common with the data presented here. Our finding that Ino4p interacts with five bHLH proteins suggests that Ino4p is likely to be a central player in the coordination of multiple biological processes.},
	keywords = {DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Lac Operon, Methyltransferases, Phosphatidylethanolamine N-Methyltransferase, Plasmids, Protein Binding, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation, Two-Hybrid System Techniques},
	issn = {1362-4962},
	author = {Robinson, K A and Koepke, J I and Kharodawala, M and Lopes, J M}
}
@article {837,
	title = {Overlapping functions for recF and priA in cell viability and UV-inducible SOS expression are distinguished by dnaC809 in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {19},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996 Feb},
	pages = {871-80},
	abstract = {The recF and priA genes have roles in DNA repair and homologous recombination. Mutations in these genes also cause decreases in cell viability and alterations in UV-inducible sulAp-lacZ (SOS) expression. To find out if the two genes are in the same or different pathways for viability and SOS expression, the phenotypes of the double mutant strains were studied. The recF priA double mutant showed a lower viability and SOS expression level than either of the single mutants. In the case of cell viability, recF missense mutations decreased viability of a priA2::kan strain two to five-fold whereas recF null priA2::kan double mutants were not viable at all. dnaC809, a mutation that suppresses the UV-sensitive (UVs and Rec- phenotypes of priA2::kan, restored cell viability, but not UV-inducible SOS expression, to a priA recF strain. Since recF is epistatic with recO and recR (recOR) for UV resistance, recOR mutations were also tested with priA2::kan. No overlap was found between recOR and priA for viability and SOS expression. It is concluded that priA and recF have two different overlapping functions in viability and SOS expression that are distinguishable by the effects of dnaC809. The role of recF in a priA2::kan strain in cell viability is a new function for recF and unlike recF{\textquoteright}s other roles in DNA repair and recombination, is independent of recOR. A new role for priA in UV-inducible SOS expression in a recF mutant is also defined.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Bacterial, Lac Operon, Mutation, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Replication Protein A, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Sandler, S J}
}
@article {838,
	title = {recO and recR mutations delay induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {Mol Gen Genet},
	volume = {246},
	year = {1995},
	month = {1995 Jan 20},
	pages = {254-8},
	abstract = {RecF, RecO and RecR, three of the important proteins of the RecF pathway of recombination, are also needed for repair of DNA damage due to UV irradiation. recF mutants are not proficient in cleaving LexA repressor in vivo following DNA damage: therefore they show a delay of induction of the SOS response. In this communication, by measuring the in vivo levels of LexA repressor using anti-LexA antibodies, we show that recO and recR mutant strains are also not proficient in LexA cleavage reactions. In addition, we show that recO and recR mutations delay induction of beta-galactosidase activity expressed from a lexA-regulated promoter following exposure of cells to UV, thus further supporting the idea that recF, recO and recR gene products are needed for induction of the SOS response.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, beta-Galactosidase, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0026-8925},
	author = {Hegde, S and Sandler, S J and Clark, A J and Madiraju, M V}
}
@article {840,
	title = {Mutational analysis of sequences in the recF gene of Escherichia coli K-12 that affect expression.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {176},
	year = {1994},
	month = {1994 Jul},
	pages = {4011-6},
	abstract = {The level of translation of recF-lacZ fusions is reduced 20-fold by nucleotides 49 to 146 of recF. In this region of recF, we found a previously described ribosome-interactive sequence called epsilon and a hexapyrimidine tract located just upstream of the epsilon sequence. Mutational studies indicate that the hexapyrimidine sequence is involved in at least some of the reduced translation. When the hexapyrimidine sequence is mutant, mutating epsilon increases the level of translation maximally. We ruled out the possibility that ribosome frameshifting explains most of the effect of these two sequences on expression and suspect that multiple mechanisms may be responsible. In a separate report, we show that mutations in the hexapyrimidine tract and epsilon increase expression of the full-sized recF gene.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, DNA Mutational Analysis, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Half-Life, Lac Operon, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Biosynthesis, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Ribosomes},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Clark, A J}
}
@article {845,
	title = {Factors affecting expression of the recF gene of Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Gene},
	volume = {86},
	year = {1990},
	month = {1990 Jan 31},
	pages = {35-43},
	abstract = {This report describes four factors which affect expression of the recF gene from strong upstream lambda promoters under temperature-sensitive cIAt2-encoded repressor control. The first factor was the long mRNA leader sequence consisting of the Escherichia coli dnaN gene and 95\% of the dnaA gene and lambda bet, N (double amber) and 40\% of the exo gene. When most of this DNA was deleted, RecF became detectable in maxicells. The second factor was the vector, pBEU28, a runaway replication plasmid. When we substituted pUC118 for pBEU28, RecF became detectable in whole cells by the Coomassie blue staining technique. The third factor was the efficiency of initiation of translation. We used site-directed mutagenesis to change the mRNA leader, ribosome-binding site and the 3 bp before and after the translational start codon. Monitoring the effect of these mutational changes by translational fusion to lacZ, we discovered that the efficiency of initiation of translation was increased 30-fold. Only an estimated two- or threefold increase in accumulated levels of RecF occurred, however. This led us to discover the fourth factor, namely sequences in the recF gene itself. These sequences reduce expression of the recF-lacZ fusion genes 100-fold. The sequences responsible for this decrease in expression occur in four regions in the N-terminal half of recF. Expression is reduced by some sequences at the transcriptional level and by others at the translational level.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Cloning, Molecular, Escherichia coli, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Chain Initiation, Translational, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {0378-1119},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Clark, A J}
}
