@article {452,
	title = {Genome-wide gene regulation of biosynthesis and energy generation by a novel transcriptional repressor in Geobacter species.},
	journal = {Nucleic Acids Res},
	volume = {38},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 Jan},
	pages = {810-21},
	abstract = {Geobacter species play important roles in bioremediation of contaminated environments and in electricity production from waste organic matter in microbial fuel cells. To better understand physiology of Geobacter species, expression and function of citrate synthase, a key enzyme in the TCA cycle that is important for organic acid oxidation in Geobacter species, was investigated. Geobacter sulfurreducens did not require citrate synthase for growth with hydrogen as the electron donor and fumarate as the electron acceptor. Expression of the citrate synthase gene, gltA, was repressed by a transcription factor under this growth condition. Functional and comparative genomics approaches, coupled with genetic and biochemical assays, identified a novel transcription factor termed HgtR that acts as a repressor for gltA. Further analysis revealed that HgtR is a global regulator for genes involved in biosynthesis and energy generation in Geobacter species. The hgtR gene was essential for growth with hydrogen, during which hgtR expression was induced. These findings provide important new insights into the mechanisms by which Geobacter species regulate their central metabolism under different environmental conditions.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Citrate (si)-Synthase, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Geobacter, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1362-4962},
	doi = {10.1093/nar/gkp1085},
	author = {Ueki, Toshiyuki and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {488,
	title = {Gene transcript analysis of assimilatory iron limitation in Geobacteraceae during groundwater bioremediation.},
	journal = {Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 May},
	pages = {1218-30},
	abstract = {Limitations on the availability of Fe(III) as an electron acceptor are thought to play an important role in restricting the growth and activity of Geobacter species during bioremediation of contaminated subsurface environments, but the possibility that these organisms might also be limited in the subsurface by the availability of iron for assimilatory purposes was not previously considered because copious quantities of Fe(II) are produced as the result of Fe(III) reduction. Analysis of multiple Geobacteraceae genomes revealed the presence of a three-gene cluster consisting of homologues of two iron-dependent regulators, fur and dtxR (ideR), separated by a homologue of feoB, which encodes an Fe(II) uptake protein. This cluster appears to be conserved among members of the Geobacteraceae and was detected in several environments. Expression of the fur-feoB-ideR cluster decreased as Fe(II) concentrations increased in chemostat cultures. The number of Geobacteraceae feoB transcripts in groundwater samples from a site undergoing in situ uranium bioremediation was relatively high until the concentration of dissolved Fe(II) increased near the end of the field experiment. These results suggest that, because much of the Fe(II) is sequestered in solid phases, Geobacter species, which have a high requirement for iron for iron-sulfur proteins, may be limited by the amount of iron available for assimilatory purposes. These results demonstrate the ability of transcript analysis to reveal previously unsuspected aspects of the in situ physiology of microorganisms in subsurface environments.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Biodegradation, Environmental, Culture Media, Ferric Compounds, Ferrous Compounds, Fresh Water, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Geobacter, Iron, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Repressor Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transcription, Genetic, Uranium, Water Pollution, Radioactive},
	issn = {1462-2920},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01537.x},
	author = {O{\textquoteright}Neil, Regina A and Holmes, Dawn E and Coppi, Maddalena V and Adams, Lorrie A and Larrahondo, M Juliana and Ward, Joy E and Nevin, Kelly P and Woodard, Trevor L and Vrionis, Helen A and N{\textquoteright}guessan, Lucie A and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {34,
	title = {Transcription regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PIS1 gene by inositol and the pleiotropic regulator, Ume6p.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {70},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Dec},
	pages = {1529-39},
	abstract = {In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, transcription of most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes (e.g. INO1, CHO1, CHO2 and OPI3) is repressed by growth in the presence of inositol and choline and derepressed in their absence. This regulation requires the Ino2p and Ino4p activators and the Opi1p repressor. The PIS1 structural gene is required for the synthesis of the essential lipid phosphatidylinositol. Previous reports show that PIS1 expression is uncoupled from inositol/choline regulation, but is regulated by carbon source, hypoxia and zinc. However, in this study we found that the expression of PIS1 is induced twofold by inositol. This regulation did not require Ino2p and Ino4p, although Ino4p was required for full expression. Ino4p is a basic helix-loop-helix protein that requires a binding partner. Curiously, none of the other basic helix-loop-helix proteins affected PIS1 expression. Inositol induction did require another general regulator of phospholipid biosynthesis, Ume6p. Ume6p was found to be a positive regulator of PIS1 gene expression. Ume6p, and several associated factors, were required for inositol-mediated induction and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed that Ume6p directly regulates PIS1 expression. Thus, we demonstrate novel regulation of the PIS1 gene by Ume6p.},
	keywords = {Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Histone Deacetylases, Inositol, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Transferases (Other Substituted Phosphate Groups)},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06506.x},
	author = {Jani, Niketa M and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {503,
	title = {Genome-wide expression profiling in Geobacter sulfurreducens: identification of Fur and RpoS transcription regulatory sites in a relGsu mutant.},
	journal = {Funct Integr Genomics},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Jul},
	pages = {229-55},
	abstract = {Rel(Gsu) is the single Geobacter sulfurreducens homolog of RelA and SpoT proteins found in many organisms. These proteins are involved in the regulation of levels of guanosine 3{\textquoteright}, 5{\textquoteright} bispyrophosphate, ppGpp, a molecule that signals slow growth and stress response under nutrient limitation in bacteria. We used information obtained from genome-wide expression profiling of the rel(Gsu) deletion mutant to identify putative regulatory sites involved in transcription networks modulated by Rel(Gsu) or ppGpp. Differential gene expression in the rel(Gsu) deletion mutant, as compared to the wild type, was available from two growth conditions, steady state chemostat cultures and stationary phase batch cultures. Hierarchical clustering analysis of these two datasets identified several groups of operons that are likely co-regulated. Using a search for conserved motifs in the upstream regions of these co-regulated operons, we identified sequences similar to Fur- and RpoS-regulated sites. These findings suggest that Fur- and RpoS-dependent gene expression in G. sulfurreducens is affected by Rel(Gsu)-mediated signaling.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Gene Deletion, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Geobacter, Ligases, Mutation, Operon, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Repressor Proteins, Sigma Factor, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1438-793X},
	doi = {10.1007/s10142-007-0048-5},
	author = {Krushkal, Julia and Yan, Bin and DiDonato, Laurie N and Puljic, Marko and Nevin, Kelly P and Woodard, Trevor L and Adkins, Ronald M and Meth{\'e}, Barbara A and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {38,
	title = {Analysis of Opi1p repressor mutants.},
	journal = {Curr Genet},
	volume = {49},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Jan},
	pages = {30-8},
	abstract = {Opi1p is the only known repressor protein specific to the phospholipid biosynthetic pathway. Opi1p is required for repression in response to inositol and choline supplementation. However, the mechanism of Opi1p repression is not completely understood. In part, this is because previously identified opi1 mutants contained nonsense mutations and thus provided little insight into the mechanism of Opi1p function. We have recently reported isolating novel opi1 mutants (rum and dim mutants) that contain missense mutations. Here, we show that these opi1 mutants produce Opi1p product at levels comparable to a wild-type strain. However, these mutants mis-regulate expression of two target genes, INO2-HIS3 and INO1-lacZ, and are also defective in autoregulation. An opi1-S339F mutant is particularly interesting because it completely eliminated autoregulation, but only abated regulation of an INO1-lacZ reporter. Two of the mutations in OPI1 (V343Q and S339F) provide genetic evidence for an interaction between Opi1p and the Ino2p activator since they reside in a region of Opi1p recently shown to interact with Ino2p in vitro. A third mutation (L252F) resides in a region of Opi1p with no known function.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Conserved Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Missense, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0172-8083},
	doi = {10.1007/s00294-005-0021-6},
	author = {Kaadige, Mohan R and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {37,
	title = {Genomic analysis of the Opi- phenotype.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {173},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Jun},
	pages = {621-34},
	abstract = {Most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are coordinately regulated in response to inositol and choline. Inositol affects the intracellular levels of phosphatidic acid (PA). Opi1p is a repressor of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes and specifically binds PA in the endoplasmic reticulum. In the presence of inositol, PA levels decrease, releasing Opi1p into the nucleus where it represses transcription. The opi1 mutant overproduces and excretes inositol into the growth medium in the absence of inositol and choline (Opi(-) phenotype). To better understand the mechanism of Opi1p repression, the viable yeast deletion set was screened to identify Opi(-) mutants. In total, 89 Opi(-) mutants were identified, of which 7 were previously known to have the Opi(-) phenotype. The Opi(-) mutant collection included genes with roles in phospholipid biosynthesis, transcription, protein processing/synthesis, and protein trafficking. Included in this set were all nonessential components of the NuA4 HAT complex and six proteins in the Rpd3p-Sin3p HDAC complex. It has previously been shown that defects in phosphatidylcholine synthesis (cho2 and opi3) yield the Opi(-) phenotype because of a buildup of PA. However, in this case the Opi(-) phenotype is conditional because PA can be shuttled through a salvage pathway (Kennedy pathway) by adding choline to the growth medium. Seven new mutants present in the Opi(-) collection (fun26, kex1, nup84, tps1, mrpl38, mrpl49, and opi10/yol032w) were also suppressed by choline, suggesting that these affect PC synthesis. Regulation in response to inositol is also coordinated with the unfolded protein response (UPR). Consistent with this, several Opi(-) mutants were found to affect the UPR (yhi9, ede1, and vps74).},
	keywords = {Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Fungal, Genes, Reporter, Genome, Fungal, Genomics, Inositol, Lac Operon, Models, Biological, Mutation, Phenotype, Phospholipids, Protein Folding, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	doi = {10.1534/genetics.106.057489},
	author = {Hancock, Leandria C and Behta, Ryan P and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {41,
	title = {Identification of novel dominant INO2c mutants with an Opi- phenotype.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {52},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Jun},
	pages = {1271-80},
	abstract = {The INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for derepression of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes in response to inositol depletion. Conversely, the OPI1 gene is required for repression in response to inositol supplementation. Results of an in vitro assay have led to a model in which Opi1p interacts with Ino2p. However, there is no in vivo evidence to support this model. Additionally, most of the previously isolated ino2 mutants offer little insight into this model. Here, we report the isolation of a new class of dominant mutations in the INO2 gene, which yield constitutive expression of a target gene (i.e. an Opi(-) mutant phenotype). Two mutations reside in a region of the Ino2p required for interaction with Opi1p in vitro. Three other mutations are at the amino-terminus in a transcriptional activation domain.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Inositol, Mutation, Phenotype, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04069.x},
	author = {Gardenour, Kyle R and Levy, Jamie and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {42,
	title = {Expression of the yeast PIS1 gene requires multiple regulatory elements including a Rox1p binding site.},
	journal = {J Biol Chem},
	volume = {278},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 Oct 3},
	pages = {38646-52},
	abstract = {The PIS1 gene is required for de novo synthesis of phosphatidylinositol (PI), an essential phospholipid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PIS1 gene expression is unusual because it is uncoupled from the other phospholipid biosynthetic genes, which are regulated in response to inositol and choline. Relatively little is known about regulation of transcription of the PIS1 gene. We reported previously that PIS1 transcription is sensitive to carbon source. To further our understanding of the regulation of PIS1 transcription, we carried out a promoter deletion analysis that identified three regions required for PIS1 gene expression (upstream activating sequence (UAS) elements 1-3). Deletion of either UAS1 or UAS2 resulted in an approximately 45\% reduction in expression, whereas removal of UAS3 yielded an 84\% decrease in expression. A comparison of promoters among several Saccharomyces species shows that these sequences are highly conserved. Curiously, the UAS3 element region (-149 to -138) includes a Rox1p binding site. Rox1p is a repressor of hypoxic genes under aerobic growth conditions. Consistent with this, we have found that expression of a PIS1-cat reporter was repressed under aerobic conditions, and this repression was dependent on both Rox1p and its binding site. Furthermore, PI levels were elevated under anaerobic conditions. This is the first evidence that PI levels are affected by regulation of PIS1 transcription.},
	keywords = {Anoxia, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Carbon, Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase, Choline, Chromatography, Thin Layer, Conserved Sequence, DNA, DNA, Complementary, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Deletion, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Reporter, Inositol, Lipid Metabolism, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxygen, Phospholipids, Plasmids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Repressor Proteins, RNA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Transferases (Other Substituted Phosphate Groups)},
	issn = {0021-9258},
	doi = {10.1074/jbc.M305251200},
	author = {Gardocki, Mary Elizabeth and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {43,
	title = {Opi1p, Ume6p and Sin3p control expression from the promoter of the INO2 regulatory gene via a novel regulatory cascade.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {48},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 May},
	pages = {823-32},
	abstract = {The INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for expression of most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes. INO2 expression is regulated by a complex cascade that includes autoregulation, Opi1p-mediated repression and Ume6p-mediated activation. To screen for mutants with altered INO2 expression directly, we constructed an INO2-HIS3 reporter that provides a plate assay for INO2 promoter activity. This reporter was used to isolate mutants (dim1) that fail to repress expression of the INO2 gene in an otherwise wild-type strain. The dim1 mutants contain mutations in the OPI1 gene. To define further the mechanism for Ume6p regulation of INO2 expression, we isolated suppressors (rum1, 2, 3) of the ume6Delta mutation that overexpress the INO2-HIS3 gene. Two of the rum mutant groups contain mutations in the OPI1 and SIN3 genes showing that opi1 and sin3 mutations are epistatic to the ume6Delta mutation. These results are surprising given that Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p are known to form a complex that represses the expression of a diverse set of yeast genes. This prompted us to examine the effect of sin3Delta and rpd3Delta mutants on INO2-cat expression. Surprisingly, the sin3Delta allele overexpressed INO2-cat, whereas the rpd3Delta mutant had no effect. We also show that the UME6 gene does not affect the expression of an OPI1-cat reporter. This suggests that Ume6p does not regulate INO2 expression indirectly by regulating OPI1 expression.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Regulator, Genes, Reporter, Genetic Complementation Test, Histone Deacetylases, Methyltransferases, Phenotype, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Kaadige, Mohan R and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {45,
	title = {Combinatorial regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression by the UME6, SIN3 and RPD3 genes.},
	journal = {Nucleic Acids Res},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 Aug 15},
	pages = {3160-7},
	abstract = {The Ume6p-Sin3p-Rpd3p complex negatively regulates expression of genes containing a Ume6p binding site. However, these regulatory proteins also function independently to regulate gene expression both negatively and positively. The model system for this combinatorial regulation is the yeast phospholipid biosynthetic pathway. Sin3p negatively regulates the INO1, CHO1, CHO2 and OPI3 genes while Ume6p negatively regulates the INO1 gene and positively regulates the other genes. We have suggested that the positive regulation results from indirect effects on expression of the INO2 transcriptional activator gene. Here, we demonstrate that the effect of Ume6p on INO2 gene expression is also indirect. We also show that Rpd3p is a negative regulator of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression. The ability of Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p to differentially regulate expression of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes affects phospholipid composition. A sin3 mutant strain lacks detectable levels of phosphatidylethanolamine and elevated levels of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and a rpd3 mutant strain has reduced levels of PC. These alterations in membrane composition suggest that there may exist additional differences in regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression and that membrane compositions may be coordinated with other biological processes regulated by Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Histone Deacetylases, Kinetics, Phospholipids, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1362-4962},
	author = {Elkhaimi, M and Kaadige, M R and Kamath, D and Jackson, J C and Biliran, H and Lopes, J M}
}
@article {46,
	title = {The promoter of the yeast INO4 regulatory gene: a model of the simplest yeast promoter.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {182},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 May},
	pages = {2746-52},
	abstract = {In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the phospholipid biosynthetic genes are transcriptionally regulated in response to inositol and choline. This regulation requires the transcriptional activator proteins Ino4p and Ino2p, which form a heterodimer that binds to the UAS(INO) element. We have previously shown that the promoters of the INO4 and INO2 genes are among the weakest promoters characterized in yeast. Because little is known about the promoters of weakly expressed yeast genes, we report here the analysis of the constitutive INO4 promoter. Promoter deletion constructs scanning 1,000 bp upstream of the INO4 gene identified a small region (-58 to -46) that is absolutely required for expression. S1 nuclease mapping shows that this region contains the transcription start sites for the INO4 gene. An additional element (-114 to -86) modestly enhances INO4 promoter activity (fivefold). Thus, the region required for INO4 transcription is limited to 68 bp. These studies also found that INO4 gene expression is not autoregulated by Ino2p and Ino4p, despite the presence of a putative UAS(INO) element in the INO4 promoter. We further report that the INO4 steady-state transcript levels and Ino4p levels are regulated twofold in response to inositol and choline, suggesting a posttranscriptional mechanism of regulation.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	author = {Robinson, K A and Lopes, J M}
}
@article {836,
	title = {Differential suppression of priA2::kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {143},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996 May},
	pages = {5-13},
	abstract = {First identified as an essential component of the phi X174 in vitro DNA replication system, PriA has ATPase, helicase, translocase, and primosome-assembly activities. priA1::kan strains of Escherichia coli are sensitive to UV irradiation, deficient in homologous recombination following transduction, and filamentous. priA2::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression than wild type. We show that (1) priA1::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression, (2) priA2::kan strains are UVS and Rec-, (3) lexA3 suppresses the high basal levels of SOS expression of a priA2::kan strain, and (4) plasmid-encoded priA300 (K230R), a mutant allele retaining only the primosome-assembly activity of priA+, restores both UVR and Rec+ phenotypes to a priA2::kan strain. Finally, we have isolated 17 independent UVR Rec+ revertants of priA2::kan strains that carry extragenic suppressors. All 17 map in the C-terminal half of the dnaC gene. DnaC loads the DnaB helicase onto DNA as a prelude for primosome assembly and DNA replication. We conclude that priA{\textquoteright}s primosome-assembly activity is essential for DNA repair and recombination and that the dnaC suppressor mutations allow these processes to occur in the absence of priA.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophage phi X 174, beta-Galactosidase, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Bacterial, Genetic Markers, Mutagenesis, Phenotype, Recombination, Genetic, Replication Protein A, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, Suppression, Genetic, Transduction, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Samra, H S and Clark, A J}
}
@article {796,
	title = {Mosaic structure of plasmids from natural populations of Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {143},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996 Jul},
	pages = {1091-100},
	abstract = {The distribution of plasmids related to the fertility factor F was examined in the ECOR reference collection of Escherichia coli. Probes specific for four F-related genes were isolated and used to survey the collection by DNA hybridization. To estimate the genetic diversity of genes in F-like plasmids, DNA sequences were obtained for four plasmid genes. The phylogenetic relationships among the plasmids in the ECOR strains is very different from that of the strains themselves. This finding supports the view that plasmid transfer has been frequent within and between the major groups of ECOR. Furthermore, the sequences indicate that recombination between genes in plasmids takes place at a considerably higher frequency than that observed for chromosomal genes. The plasmid genes, and by inference the plasmids themselves, are mosaic in structure with different regions acquired from different sources. Comparison of gene sequences from a variety of naturally occurring plasmids suggested a plausible donor of some of the recombinant regions as well as implicating a chi site in the mechanism of genetic exchange. The relatively high rate of recombination in F-plasmid genes suggests that conjugational gene transfer may play a greater role in bacterial population structure than previously appreciated.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, DNA Helicases, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Membrane Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mosaicism, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Phylogeny, Plasmids, Polymorphism, Genetic, Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, RNA-Binding Proteins, Trans-Activators},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Boyd, E F and Hill, C W and Rich, S M and Hartl, D L}
}
@article {838,
	title = {recO and recR mutations delay induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {Mol Gen Genet},
	volume = {246},
	year = {1995},
	month = {1995 Jan 20},
	pages = {254-8},
	abstract = {RecF, RecO and RecR, three of the important proteins of the RecF pathway of recombination, are also needed for repair of DNA damage due to UV irradiation. recF mutants are not proficient in cleaving LexA repressor in vivo following DNA damage: therefore they show a delay of induction of the SOS response. In this communication, by measuring the in vivo levels of LexA repressor using anti-LexA antibodies, we show that recO and recR mutant strains are also not proficient in LexA cleavage reactions. In addition, we show that recO and recR mutations delay induction of beta-galactosidase activity expressed from a lexA-regulated promoter following exposure of cells to UV, thus further supporting the idea that recF, recO and recR gene products are needed for induction of the SOS response.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, beta-Galactosidase, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0026-8925},
	author = {Hegde, S and Sandler, S J and Clark, A J and Madiraju, M V}
}
