@article {32,
	title = {Transcription regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 gene by the Ino2p and Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix proteins.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {83},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012 Jan},
	pages = {395-407},
	abstract = {<p>The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 gene product accounts for a majority of the acid phosphatase activity. Its expression is induced by the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein, Pho4p, in response to phosphate depletion. Pho4p binds predominantly to two UAS elements (UASp1 at -356 and UASp2 at -247) in the PHO5 promoter. Previous studies from our lab have shown cross-regulation of different biological processes by bHLH proteins. This study tested the ability of all yeast bHLH proteins to regulate PHO5 expression and identified inositol-mediated regulation via the Ino2p/Ino4p bHLH proteins. Ino2p/Ino4p are known regulators of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Genetic epistasis experiments showed that regulation by inositol required a third UAS site (UASp3 at -194). ChIP assays showed that Ino2p:Ino4p bind the PHO5 promoter and that this binding is dependent on Pho4p binding. These results demonstrate that phospholipid biosynthesis is co-ordinated with phosphate utilization via the bHLH proteins.</p>
},
	keywords = {Acid Phosphatase, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, DNA, Fungal, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Inositol, Models, Biological, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07941.x},
	author = {He, Ying and Swaminathan, Aishwarya and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {31,
	title = {Derepression of INO1 transcription requires cooperation between the Ino2p-Ino4p heterodimer and Cbf1p and recruitment of the ISW2 chromatin-remodeling complex.},
	journal = {Eukaryot Cell},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 Dec},
	pages = {1845-55},
	abstract = {<p>The Saccharomyces cerevisiae INO1 gene encodes the structural enzyme inositol-3-phosphate synthase for the synthesis de novo of inositol and inositol-containing phospholipids. The transcription of INO1 is completely derepressed in the absence of inositol and choline (I(-) C(-)). Derepression requires the binding of the Ino2p-Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) heterodimer to the UAS(INO) promoter element. We report here the requirement of a third bHLH protein, centromere-binding factor 1 (Cbf1p), for the complete derepression of INO1 transcription. We found that Cbf1p regulates INO1 transcription by binding to sites distal to the INO1 promoter and encompassing the upstream SNA3 open reading frame (ORF) and promoter. The binding of Cbf1p requires Ino2p-Ino4p binding to the UAS(INO) sites in the INO1 promoter and vice versa, suggesting a cooperative mechanism. Furthermore, Cbf1p binding to the upstream sites was required for the binding of the ISW2 chromatin-remodeling complex to the Ino2p-Ino4p-binding sites on the INO1 promoter. Consistent with this, ISW2 was also required for the complete derepression of INO1 transcription.</p>
},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Chromatin, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Dimerization, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1535-9786},
	doi = {10.1128/EC.00144-10},
	author = {Shetty, Ameet and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {436,
	title = {Genome-wide survey for PilR recognition sites of the metal-reducing prokaryote Geobacter sulfurreducens.},
	journal = {Gene},
	volume = {469},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 Dec 1},
	pages = {31-44},
	abstract = {Geobacter sulfurreducens is a species from the bacterial family Geobacteraceae, members of which participate in bioenergy production and in environmental bioremediation. G. sulfurreducens pili are electrically conductive and are required for Fe(III) oxide reduction and for optimal current production in microbial fuel cells. PilR is an enhancer binding protein, which is an activator acting together with the alternative sigma factor, RpoN, in transcriptional regulation. Both RpoN and PilR are involved in regulation of expression of the pilA gene, whose product is pilin, a structural component of a pilus. Using bioinformatic approaches, we predicted G. sulfurreducens sequence elements that are likely to be regulated by PilR. The functional importance of the genome region containing a PilR binding site predicted upstream of the pilA gene was experimentally validated. The predicted G. sulfurreducens PilR binding sites are similar to PilR binding sites of Pseudomonas and Moraxella. While the number of predicted PilR-regulated sites did not deviate from that expected by chance, multiple sites were predicted upstream of genes with roles in biosynthesis and function of pili and flagella, in secretory pathways, and in cell wall biogenesis, suggesting the possible involvement of G. sulfurreducens PilR in regulation of production and assembly of pili and flagella.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Conserved Sequence, Ferric Compounds, Fimbriae Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Geobacter, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1879-0038},
	doi = {10.1016/j.gene.2010.08.005},
	author = {Krushkal, Julia and Ju{\'a}rez, Katy and Barbe, Jose F and Qu, Yanhua and Andrade, Angel and Puljic, Marko and Adkins, Ronald M and Lovley, Derek R and Ueki, Toshiyuki}
}
@article {461,
	title = {The genome sequence of Geobacter metallireducens: features of metabolism, physiology and regulation common and dissimilar to Geobacter sulfurreducens.},
	journal = {BMC Microbiol},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009},
	pages = {109},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: The genome sequence of Geobacter metallireducens is the second to be completed from the metal-respiring genus Geobacter, and is compared in this report to that of Geobacter sulfurreducens in order to understand their metabolic, physiological and regulatory similarities and differences.

RESULTS: The experimentally observed greater metabolic versatility of G. metallireducens versus G. sulfurreducens is borne out by the presence of more numerous genes for metabolism of organic acids including acetate, propionate, and pyruvate. Although G. metallireducens lacks a dicarboxylic acid transporter, it has acquired a second putative succinate dehydrogenase/fumarate reductase complex, suggesting that respiration of fumarate was important until recently in its evolutionary history. Vestiges of the molybdate (ModE) regulon of G. sulfurreducens can be detected in G. metallireducens, which has lost the global regulatory protein ModE but retained some putative ModE-binding sites and multiplied certain genes of molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis. Several enzymes of amino acid metabolism are of different origin in the two species, but significant patterns of gene organization are conserved. Whereas most Geobacteraceae are predicted to obtain biosynthetic reducing equivalents from electron transfer pathways via a ferredoxin oxidoreductase, G. metallireducens can derive them from the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway. In addition to the evidence of greater metabolic versatility, the G. metallireducens genome is also remarkable for the abundance of multicopy nucleotide sequences found in intergenic regions and even within genes.

CONCLUSION: The genomic evidence suggests that metabolism, physiology and regulation of gene expression in G. metallireducens may be dramatically different from other Geobacteraceae.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Geobacter, Phylogeny, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Species Specificity, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {1471-2180},
	doi = {10.1186/1471-2180-9-109},
	author = {Aklujkar, Muktak and Krushkal, Julia and DiBartolo, Genevieve and Lapidus, Alla and Land, Miriam L and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {509,
	title = {Genome-wide similarity search for transcription factors and their binding sites in a metal-reducing prokaryote Geobacter sulfurreducens.},
	journal = {Biosystems},
	volume = {90},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Sep-Oct},
	pages = {421-41},
	abstract = {The knowledge obtained from understanding individual elements involved in gene regulation is important for reconstructing gene regulatory networks, a key for understanding cellular behavior. To study gene regulatory interactions in a model microorganism, Geobacter sulfurreducens, which participates in metal reduction and energy harvesting, we investigated the presence of 59 known Escherichia coli transcription factors and predicted transcription regulatory sites in its genome. The supplementary material, available at http://www.geobacter.org/research/genomescan/, provides the results of similarity comparisons that identified regulatory proteins of G. sulfurreducens and the genome locations of the predicted regulatory sites, including the list of putative regulatory elements in the upstream regions of every predicted operon and singleton open reading frame. Regulatory sequence elements, predicted using genome similarity searches to matrices of established transcription regulatory elements from E. coli, provide an initial insight into regulation of genes and operons in G. sulfurreducens. The predicted regulatory elements were predominantly located in the upstream regions of operons and singleton open reading frames. The validity of the predictions was examined using a permutation approach. Sequence similarity searches indicate that E. coli transcription factors ArgR, CytR, DeoR, FlhCD (both FlhC and FlhD subunits), FruR, GalR, GlpR, H-NS, LacI, MetJ, PurR, TrpR, and Tus are likely missing from G. sulfurreducens. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that one HU subunit is present in G. sulfurreducens as compared to two subunits in E. coli, while each of the two E. coli IHF subunits, HimA and HimD, have two homologs in G. sulfurreducens. The closest homolog of E. coli RpoE in G. sulfurreducens may be more similar to FecI than to RpoE. These findings represent the first step in the understanding of the regulatory relationships in G. sulfurreducens on the genome scale.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Binding Sites, False Positive Reactions, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Geobacter, Metals, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Models, Statistical, Operon, Phylogeny, Sigma Factor, Systems Biology, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {0303-2647},
	doi = {10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.10.006},
	author = {Yan, Bin and Lovley, Derek R and Krushkal, Julia}
}
@article {36,
	title = {Transcriptional regulation of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes.},
	journal = {Biochim Biophys Acta},
	volume = {1771},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Mar},
	pages = {310-21},
	abstract = {The last several years have been witness to significant developments in understanding transcriptional regulation of the yeast phospholipid structural genes. The response of most phospholipid structural genes to inositol is now understood on a mechanistic level. The roles of specific activators and repressors are also well established. The knowledge of specific regulatory factors that bind the promoters of phospholipid structural genes serves as a foundation for understanding the role of chromatin modification complexes. Collectively, these findings present a complex picture for transcriptional regulation of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes. The INO1 gene is an ideal example of the complexity of transcriptional control and continues to serve as a model for studying transcription in general. Furthermore, transcription of the regulatory genes is also subject to complex and essential regulation. In addition, databases resulting from a plethora of genome-wide studies have identified regulatory signals that control one of the essential phospholipid biosynthetic genes, PIS1. These databases also provide significant clues for other regulatory signals that may affect phospholipid biosynthesis. Here, we have tried to present a complete summary of the transcription factors and mechanisms that regulate the phospholipid biosynthetic genes.},
	keywords = {CDP-Diacylglycerol-Inositol 3-Phosphatidyltransferase, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Intramolecular Lyases, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Phospholipids, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Yeasts},
	issn = {0006-3002},
	doi = {10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.05.017},
	author = {Chen, Meng and Hancock, Leandria C and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {38,
	title = {Analysis of Opi1p repressor mutants.},
	journal = {Curr Genet},
	volume = {49},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Jan},
	pages = {30-8},
	abstract = {Opi1p is the only known repressor protein specific to the phospholipid biosynthetic pathway. Opi1p is required for repression in response to inositol and choline supplementation. However, the mechanism of Opi1p repression is not completely understood. In part, this is because previously identified opi1 mutants contained nonsense mutations and thus provided little insight into the mechanism of Opi1p function. We have recently reported isolating novel opi1 mutants (rum and dim mutants) that contain missense mutations. Here, we show that these opi1 mutants produce Opi1p product at levels comparable to a wild-type strain. However, these mutants mis-regulate expression of two target genes, INO2-HIS3 and INO1-lacZ, and are also defective in autoregulation. An opi1-S339F mutant is particularly interesting because it completely eliminated autoregulation, but only abated regulation of an INO1-lacZ reporter. Two of the mutations in OPI1 (V343Q and S339F) provide genetic evidence for an interaction between Opi1p and the Ino2p activator since they reside in a region of Opi1p recently shown to interact with Ino2p in vitro. A third mutation (L252F) resides in a region of Opi1p with no known function.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Conserved Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Missense, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0172-8083},
	doi = {10.1007/s00294-005-0021-6},
	author = {Kaadige, Mohan R and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {396,
	title = {Characterization of TetD as a transcriptional activator of a subset of genes of the Escherichia coli SoxS/MarA/Rob regulon.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {56},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 May},
	pages = {1103-17},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, SoxS, MarA and Rob form a closely related subset of the AraC/XylS family of positive regulators, sharing approximately 42\% amino acid sequence identity over the length of SoxS and the ability to activate transcription of a common set of target genes that provide resistance to redox-cycling compounds and antibiotics. On the basis of its approximately 43\% amino acid sequence identity with SoxS, MarA and Rob, TetD, encoded by transposon Tn10, appears to be a fourth member of the subset. However, although its expression has been shown to be negatively regulated by TetC and not inducible by tetracycline, the physiological function of TetD is unknown. Accordingly, in the work presented here, we initiate a molecular characterization of TetD. We show that expression of TetD activates transcription of a subset of the SoxS/MarA/Rob regulon genes and confers resistance to redox-cycling compounds and antibiotics. We show that mutations in the putative TetD binding site of a TetD-activatable promoter and a mutation in the protein{\textquoteright}s N-terminal DNA recognition helix interfere with transcription activation, thereby indicating that TetD directly activates target gene transcription. Finally, we show that TetD, like SoxS and MarA, is intrinsically unstable; however, unlike SoxS and MarA, TetD is not degraded by Lon or any of the cell{\textquoteright}s known cytoplasmic ATP-dependent proteases. Thus, we conclude that TetD is a bona fide member of the SoxS/MarA/Rob subfamily of positive regulators.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Multigene Family, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Regulon, Tetracycline Resistance, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04599.x},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Becker, Stephen M and Wolf, Richard E}
}
@article {41,
	title = {Identification of novel dominant INO2c mutants with an Opi- phenotype.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {52},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Jun},
	pages = {1271-80},
	abstract = {The INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for derepression of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes in response to inositol depletion. Conversely, the OPI1 gene is required for repression in response to inositol supplementation. Results of an in vitro assay have led to a model in which Opi1p interacts with Ino2p. However, there is no in vivo evidence to support this model. Additionally, most of the previously isolated ino2 mutants offer little insight into this model. Here, we report the isolation of a new class of dominant mutations in the INO2 gene, which yield constitutive expression of a target gene (i.e. an Opi(-) mutant phenotype). Two mutations reside in a region of the Ino2p required for interaction with Opi1p in vitro. Three other mutations are at the amino-terminus in a transcriptional activation domain.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Inositol, Mutation, Phenotype, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04069.x},
	author = {Gardenour, Kyle R and Levy, Jamie and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {43,
	title = {Opi1p, Ume6p and Sin3p control expression from the promoter of the INO2 regulatory gene via a novel regulatory cascade.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {48},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 May},
	pages = {823-32},
	abstract = {The INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for expression of most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes. INO2 expression is regulated by a complex cascade that includes autoregulation, Opi1p-mediated repression and Ume6p-mediated activation. To screen for mutants with altered INO2 expression directly, we constructed an INO2-HIS3 reporter that provides a plate assay for INO2 promoter activity. This reporter was used to isolate mutants (dim1) that fail to repress expression of the INO2 gene in an otherwise wild-type strain. The dim1 mutants contain mutations in the OPI1 gene. To define further the mechanism for Ume6p regulation of INO2 expression, we isolated suppressors (rum1, 2, 3) of the ume6Delta mutation that overexpress the INO2-HIS3 gene. Two of the rum mutant groups contain mutations in the OPI1 and SIN3 genes showing that opi1 and sin3 mutations are epistatic to the ume6Delta mutation. These results are surprising given that Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p are known to form a complex that represses the expression of a diverse set of yeast genes. This prompted us to examine the effect of sin3Delta and rpd3Delta mutants on INO2-cat expression. Surprisingly, the sin3Delta allele overexpressed INO2-cat, whereas the rpd3Delta mutant had no effect. We also show that the UME6 gene does not affect the expression of an OPI1-cat reporter. This suggests that Ume6p does not regulate INO2 expression indirectly by regulating OPI1 expression.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Regulator, Genes, Reporter, Genetic Complementation Test, Histone Deacetylases, Methyltransferases, Phenotype, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Kaadige, Mohan R and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {400,
	title = {Evidence for "pre-recruitment" as a new mechanism of transcription activation in Escherichia coli: the large excess of SoxS binding sites per cell relative to the number of SoxS molecules per cell.},
	journal = {Biochem Biophys Res Commun},
	volume = {291},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002 Mar 8},
	pages = {979-86},
	abstract = {In response to the oxidative stress imposed by redox-cycling compounds like paraquat, Escherichia coli induces the synthesis of SoxS, which then activates the transcription of approximately 100 genes. The DNA binding site for SoxS-dependent transcription activation, the "soxbox," is highly degenerate, suggesting that the genome contains a large number of SoxS binding sites. To estimate the number of soxboxes in the cell, we searched the E. coli genome for SoxS binding sites using as query sequence the previously determined optimal SoxS binding sequence. We found approximately 12,500 sequences that match the optimal binding sequence under the conditions of our search; this agrees with our previous estimate, based on information theory, that a random sequence the size of the E. coli genome contains approximately 13,000 soxboxes. Thus, fast-growing cells with 4-6 genomes per cell have approximately 65,000 soxboxes. This large number of potential SoxS binding sites per cell raises the interesting question of how SoxS distinguishes between the functional soxboxes located within the promoters of target genes and the plethora of equivalent but nonfunctional binding sites scattered throughout the chromosome. To address this question, we treated cells with paraquat and used Western blot analysis to determine the kinetics of SoxS accumulation per cell; we also determined the kinetics of SoxS-activated gene expression. The abundance of SoxS reached a maximum of 2,500 molecules per cell 20 min after induction and gradually declined to approximately 500 molecules per cell over the next 1.5 h. Given that activation of target gene expression began almost immediately and given the large disparity between the number of SoxS molecules per cell, 2,500, and the number of SoxS binding sites per cell, 65,000, we infer that SoxS is not likely to activate transcription by the usual "recruitment" pathway, as this mechanism would require a number of SoxS molecules similar to the number of soxboxes. Instead, we propose that SoxS first interacts in solution with RNA polymerase and then the binary complex scans the chromosome for promoters that contain a soxbox properly positioned and oriented for transcription activation. We name this new pathway "pre-recruitment."},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Binding Sites, Blotting, Western, Cell Division, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Kinetics, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Oxidative Stress, Paraquat, Protein Transport, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {0006-291X},
	doi = {10.1006/bbrc.2002.6559},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Shah, Ishita M and Myers, Todd E and O{\textquoteright}Neill, Michael C and Wolf, Richard E}
}
@article {402,
	title = {Systematic mutagenesis of the DNA binding sites for SoxS in the Escherichia coli zwf and fpr promoters: identifying nucleotides required for DNA binding and transcription activation.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {40},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Jun},
	pages = {1141-54},
	abstract = {SoxS is the direct transcriptional activator of at least 15 genes of the Escherichia coli superoxide regulon. SoxS is small (107 amino acids), binds DNA as a monomer and recognizes a highly degenerate DNA binding site, termed {\textquoteright}soxbox{\textquoteright}. Like other members of the AraC/XylS family, SoxS has two putative helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motifs, and it has been proposed that each HTH motif recognizes a highly conserved recognition element of the soxbox. To determine which nucleotides are important for SoxS binding, we conducted a systematic mutagenesis of the DNA binding sites for SoxS in the zwf and fpr promoters and determined the effect of the soxbox mutations on SoxS DNA binding and transcription activation in vivo by measuring beta-galactosidase activity in strains with fusions to lacZ. We found that the sequences GCAC and CAAA, termed recognition elements 1 and 2 (RE 1 and RE 2), respectively, are critical for SoxS binding, as mutations within these elements severely hinder or eliminate SoxS-dependent transcription activation; substitutions within RE 2 (CAAA), however, are tolerated better than changes within RE 1 (GCAC). Although substitutions at the seven positions separating the two REs had only a modest effect on SoxS binding, AT basepairs were favoured within this {\textquoteright}spacer{\textquoteright} region, presumably because, by facilitating DNA bending, they help bring the two recognition elements into proper juxtaposition. We also found that the {\textquoteright}invariant A{\textquoteright} present at position 1 of 14/15 functional soxboxes identified thus far is important for SoxS binding, as a change to any other nucleotide at this position reduced SoxS-dependent transcription by approximately 50\%. In addition, positions surrounding the REs seem to show a context effect, in that certain substitutions there have little or no effect when the RE has the optimal binding sequence, but produce a pronounced effect when the RE has a suboptimal sequence. We propose that these nucleotides play an important role in effecting differential expression from the various promoters. Lastly, we used gel retardation assays to show that alterations in transcription activation in vivo are caused by effects on DNA binding. Based on this exhaustive mutagenesis, we propose the following optimal sequence for SoxS binding: AnVGCACWWWnKRHCAAAHn (n = A, C, G, T; V = A, C, G; W = A, T; K = G, T; R = A, G; H = A, C, T).},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Carrier Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, Electrophoresis, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Griffith, K L and Wolf, R E}
}
@article {45,
	title = {Combinatorial regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression by the UME6, SIN3 and RPD3 genes.},
	journal = {Nucleic Acids Res},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 Aug 15},
	pages = {3160-7},
	abstract = {The Ume6p-Sin3p-Rpd3p complex negatively regulates expression of genes containing a Ume6p binding site. However, these regulatory proteins also function independently to regulate gene expression both negatively and positively. The model system for this combinatorial regulation is the yeast phospholipid biosynthetic pathway. Sin3p negatively regulates the INO1, CHO1, CHO2 and OPI3 genes while Ume6p negatively regulates the INO1 gene and positively regulates the other genes. We have suggested that the positive regulation results from indirect effects on expression of the INO2 transcriptional activator gene. Here, we demonstrate that the effect of Ume6p on INO2 gene expression is also indirect. We also show that Rpd3p is a negative regulator of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression. The ability of Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p to differentially regulate expression of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes affects phospholipid composition. A sin3 mutant strain lacks detectable levels of phosphatidylethanolamine and elevated levels of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and a rpd3 mutant strain has reduced levels of PC. These alterations in membrane composition suggest that there may exist additional differences in regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression and that membrane compositions may be coordinated with other biological processes regulated by Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Histone Deacetylases, Kinetics, Phospholipids, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1362-4962},
	author = {Elkhaimi, M and Kaadige, M R and Kamath, D and Jackson, J C and Biliran, H and Lopes, J M}
}
@article {44,
	title = {A network of yeast basic helix-loop-helix interactions.},
	journal = {Nucleic Acids Res},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 Nov 15},
	pages = {4460-6},
	abstract = {The Ino4 protein belongs to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of proteins. It is known to form a dimer with Ino2p, which regulates phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Mammalian bHLH proteins have been shown to form multiple dimer combinations. However, this flexibility in dimerization had not been documented for yeast bHLH proteins. Using the yeast two-hybrid assay and a biochemical assay we show that Ino4p dimerizes with the Pho4p, Rtg1p, Rtg3p and Sgc1p bHLH proteins. Screening a yeast cDNA library identified three additional proteins that interact with Ino4p: Bck2p, YLR422W and YNR064C. The interaction with Bck2p prompted us to examine if any of the Bck2p-associated functions affect expression of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. We found that hyperosmotic growth conditions altered the growth phase regulation of a phospholipid biosynthetic gene, CHO1. There are two recent reports of initial whole genome yeast two-hybrid interactions. Interestingly, one of these reports identified five proteins that interact with Ino4p: Ino2p, Hcs1p, Apl2p, YMR317W and YNL279W. Ino2p is the only protein in common with the data presented here. Our finding that Ino4p interacts with five bHLH proteins suggests that Ino4p is likely to be a central player in the coordination of multiple biological processes.},
	keywords = {DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Lac Operon, Methyltransferases, Phosphatidylethanolamine N-Methyltransferase, Plasmids, Protein Binding, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation, Two-Hybrid System Techniques},
	issn = {1362-4962},
	author = {Robinson, K A and Koepke, J I and Kharodawala, M and Lopes, J M}
}
@article {46,
	title = {The promoter of the yeast INO4 regulatory gene: a model of the simplest yeast promoter.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {182},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 May},
	pages = {2746-52},
	abstract = {In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the phospholipid biosynthetic genes are transcriptionally regulated in response to inositol and choline. This regulation requires the transcriptional activator proteins Ino4p and Ino2p, which form a heterodimer that binds to the UAS(INO) element. We have previously shown that the promoters of the INO4 and INO2 genes are among the weakest promoters characterized in yeast. Because little is known about the promoters of weakly expressed yeast genes, we report here the analysis of the constitutive INO4 promoter. Promoter deletion constructs scanning 1,000 bp upstream of the INO4 gene identified a small region (-58 to -46) that is absolutely required for expression. S1 nuclease mapping shows that this region contains the transcription start sites for the INO4 gene. An additional element (-114 to -86) modestly enhances INO4 promoter activity (fivefold). Thus, the region required for INO4 transcription is limited to 68 bp. These studies also found that INO4 gene expression is not autoregulated by Ino2p and Ino4p, despite the presence of a putative UAS(INO) element in the INO4 promoter. We further report that the INO4 steady-state transcript levels and Ino4p levels are regulated twofold in response to inositol and choline, suggesting a posttranscriptional mechanism of regulation.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	author = {Robinson, K A and Lopes, J M}
}
@article {403,
	title = {Interdependence of the position and orientation of SoxS binding sites in the transcriptional activation of the class I subset of Escherichia coli superoxide-inducible promoters.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {34},
	year = {1999},
	month = {1999 Nov},
	pages = {414-30},
	abstract = {SoxS is the direct transcriptional activator of the member genes of the Escherichia coli superoxide regulon. At class I SoxS-dependent promoters, e.g. zwf and fpr, whose SoxS binding sites ({\textquoteright}soxbox{\textquoteright}) lie upstream of the -35 region of the promoter, activation requires the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha-subunit, while at class II SoxS-dependent promoters, e.g. fumC and micF, whose binding sites overlap the -35 region, activation is independent of the alpha-CTD. To determine whether SoxS activation of its class I promoters shows the same helical phase-dependent spacing requirement as class I promoters activated by catabolite gene activator protein, we increased the 7 bp distance between the 20 bp zwf soxbox and the zwf -35 promoter hexamer by 5 bp and 11 bp, and we decreased the 15 bp distance between the 20 bp fpr soxbox and the fpr -35 promoter hexamer by the same amounts. In both cases, displacement of the binding site by a half or full turn of the DNA helix prevented transcriptional activation. With constructs containing the binding site of one gene fused to the promoter of the other, we demonstrated that the positional requirements are a function of the specific binding site, not the promoter. Supposing that opposite orientation of the SoxS binding site at the two promoters might account for the positional requirements, we placed the zwf and fpr soxboxes in the reverse orientation at the various positions upstream of the promoters and determined the effect of orientation on transcription activation. We found that reversing the orientation of the zwf binding site converts its positional requirement to that of the fpr binding site in its normal orientation, and vice versa. Analysis by molecular information theory of DNA sequences known to bind SoxS in vitro is consistent with the opposite orientation of the zwf and fpr soxboxes.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Plasmids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Superoxides, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Wood, T I and Griffith, K L and Fawcett, W P and Jair, K W and Schneider, T D and Wolf, R E}
}
