@article {806,
	title = {RecA4142 causes SOS constitutive expression by loading onto reversed replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {192},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 May},
	pages = {2575-82},
	abstract = {Escherichia coli initiates the SOS response when single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by DNA damage is bound by RecA and forms a RecA-DNA filament. recA SOS constitutive [recA(Con)] mutants induce the SOS response in the absence of DNA damage. It has been proposed that recA(Con) mutants bind to ssDNA at replication forks, although the specific mechanism is unknown. Previously, it had been shown that recA4142(F217Y), a novel recA(Con) mutant, was dependent on RecBCD for its high SOS constitutive [SOS(Con)] expression. This was presumably because RecA4142 was loaded at a double-strand end (DSE) of DNA. Herein, it is shown that recA4142 SOS(Con) expression is additionally dependent on ruvAB (replication fork reversal [RFR] activity only) and recJ (5{\textquoteright}-->3{\textquoteright} exonuclease), xonA (3{\textquoteright}-->5{\textquoteright} exonuclease) and partially dependent on recQ (helicase). Lastly, sbcCD mutations (Mre11/Rad50 homolog) in recA4142 strains caused full SOS(Con) expression in an ruvAB-, recBCD-, recJ-, and xonA-independent manner. It is hypothesized that RuvAB catalyzes RFR, RecJ and XonA blunt the DSE (created by the RFR), and then RecBCD loads RecA4142 onto this end to produce SOS(Con) expression. In sbcCD mutants, RecA4142 can bind other DNA substrates by itself that are normally degraded by the SbcCD nuclease.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonuclease V, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Exonucleases, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01623-09},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Massoni, Shawn C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {826,
	title = {Effects of mutations involving cell division, recombination, and chromosome dimer resolution on a priA2::kan mutant.},
	journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A},
	volume = {98},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Jul 17},
	pages = {8203-10},
	abstract = {Recombinational repair of replication forks can occur either to a crossover (XO) or noncrossover (non-XO) depending on Holliday junction resolution. Once the fork is repaired by recombination, PriA is important for restarting these forks in Escherichia coli. PriA mutants are Rec(-) and UV sensitive and have poor viability and 10-fold elevated basal levels of SOS expression. PriA sulB mutant cells and their nucleoids were studied by differential interference contrast and fluorescence microscopy of 4{\textquoteright},6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-stained log phase cells. Two populations of cells were seen. Eighty four percent appeared like wild type, and 16\% of the cells were filamented and had poorly partitioned chromosomes (Par(-)). To probe potential mechanisms leading to the two populations of cells, mutations were added to the priA sulB mutant. Mutating sulA or introducing lexA3 decreased, but did not eliminate filamentation or defects in partitioning. Mutating either recA or recB virtually eliminated the Par(-) phenotype. Filamentation in the recB mutant decreased to 3\%, but increased to 28\% in the recA mutant. The ability to resolve and/or branch migrate Holliday junctions also appeared crucial in the priA mutant because removing either recG or ruvC was lethal. Lastly, it was tested whether the ability to resolve chromosome dimers caused by XOs was important in a priA mutant by mutating dif and the C-terminal portion of ftsK. Mutation of dif showed no change in phenotype whereas ftsK1cat was lethal with priA2kan. A model is proposed where the PriA-independent pathway of replication restart functions at forks that have been repaired to non-XOs.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, Bacterial Proteins, Cell Division, Chromosomes, Bacterial, Dimerization, DNA Helicases, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonuclease V, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Gene Expression, Membrane Proteins, Mutagenesis, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0027-8424},
	doi = {10.1073/pnas.121007698},
	author = {McCool, J D and Sandler, S J}
}
