@article {811,
	title = {UvrD303, a hyperhelicase mutant that antagonizes RecA-dependent SOS expression by a mechanism that depends on its C terminus.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {191},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Mar},
	pages = {1429-38},
	abstract = {Genomic integrity is critical for an organism{\textquoteright}s survival and ability to reproduce. In Escherichia coli, the UvrD helicase has roles in nucleotide excision repair and methyl-directed mismatch repair and can limit reactions by RecA under certain circumstances. UvrD303 (D403A D404A) is a hyperhelicase mutant, and when expressed from a multicopy plasmid, it results in UV sensitivity (UV(s)), recombination deficiency, and antimutability. In order to understand the molecular mechanism underlying the UV(s) phenotype of uvrD303 cells, this mutation was transferred to the E. coli chromosome and studied in single copy. It is shown here that uvrD303 mutants are UV sensitive, recombination deficient, and antimutable and additionally have a moderate defect in inducing the SOS response after UV treatment. The UV-sensitive phenotype is epistatic with recA and additive with uvrA and is partially suppressed by removing the LexA repressor. Furthermore, uvrD303 is able to inhibit constitutive SOS expression caused by the recA730 mutation. The ability of UvrD303 to antagonize SOS expression was dependent on its 40 C-terminal amino acids. It is proposed that UvrD303, via its C terminus, can decrease the levels of RecA activity in the cell.},
	keywords = {DNA Helicases, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01415-08},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Leeson, Michael C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {810,
	title = {Differential requirements of two recA mutants for constitutive SOS expression in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {PLoS One},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {e4100},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: Repairing DNA damage begins with its detection and is often followed by elicitation of a cellular response. In E. coli, RecA polymerizes on ssDNA produced after DNA damage and induces the SOS Response. The RecA-DNA filament is an allosteric effector of LexA auto-proteolysis. LexA is the repressor of the SOS Response. Not all RecA-DNA filaments, however, lead to an SOS Response. Certain recA mutants express the SOS Response (recA(C)) in the absence of external DNA damage in log phase cells.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Genetic analysis of two recA(C) mutants was used to determine the mechanism of constitutive SOS (SOS(C)) expression in a population of log phase cells using fluorescence of single cells carrying an SOS reporter system (sulAp-gfp). SOS(C) expression in recA4142 mutants was dependent on its initial level of transcription, recBCD, recFOR, recX, dinI, xthA and the type of medium in which the cells were grown. SOS(C) expression in recA730 mutants was affected by none of the mutations or conditions tested above.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: It is concluded that not all recA(C) alleles cause SOS(C) expression by the same mechanism. It is hypothesized that RecA4142 is loaded on to a double-strand end of DNA and that the RecA filament is stabilized by the presence of DinI and destabilized by RecX. RecFOR regulate the activity of RecX to destabilize the RecA filament. RecA730 causes SOS(C) expression by binding to ssDNA in a mechanism yet to be determined.},
	keywords = {Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Models, Biological, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1932-6203},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0004100},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Renzette, Nicholas and Centore, Richard C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
