@article {802,
	title = {Factors Limiting SOS Expression in Log-Phase Cells of Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {194},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012 Oct},
	pages = {5325-33},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, RecA-single-stranded DNA (RecA-ssDNA) filaments catalyze DNA repair, recombination, and induction of the SOS response. It has been shown that, while many (15 to 25\%) log-phase cells have RecA filaments, few (about 1\%) are induced for SOS. It is hypothesized that RecA{\textquoteright}s ability to induce SOS expression in log-phase cells is repressed because of the potentially detrimental effects of SOS mutagenesis. To test this, mutations were sought to produce a population where the number of cells with SOS expression more closely equaled the number of RecA filaments. Here, it is shown that deleting radA (important for resolution of recombination structures) and increasing recA transcription 2- to 3-fold with a recAo1403 operator mutation act independently to minimally satisfy this condition. This allows 24\% of mutant cells to have elevated levels of SOS expression, a percentage similar to that of cells with RecA-green fluorescent protein (RecA-GFP) foci. In an xthA (exonuclease III gene) mutant where there are 3-fold more RecA loading events, recX (a destabilizer of RecA filaments) must be additionally deleted to achieve a population of cells where the percentage having elevated SOS expression (91\%) nearly equals the percentage with at least one RecA-GFP focus (83\%). It is proposed that, in the xthA mutant, there are three independent mechanisms that repress SOS expression in log-phase cells. These are the rapid processing of RecA filaments by RadA, maintaining the concentration of RecA below a critical level, and the destabilizing of RecA filaments by RecX. Only the first two mechanisms operate independently in a wild-type cell.},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.00674-12},
	author = {Massoni, Shawn C and Leeson, Michael C and Long, Jarukit Edward and Gemme, Kristin and Mui, Alice and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {806,
	title = {RecA4142 causes SOS constitutive expression by loading onto reversed replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {192},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 May},
	pages = {2575-82},
	abstract = {Escherichia coli initiates the SOS response when single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by DNA damage is bound by RecA and forms a RecA-DNA filament. recA SOS constitutive [recA(Con)] mutants induce the SOS response in the absence of DNA damage. It has been proposed that recA(Con) mutants bind to ssDNA at replication forks, although the specific mechanism is unknown. Previously, it had been shown that recA4142(F217Y), a novel recA(Con) mutant, was dependent on RecBCD for its high SOS constitutive [SOS(Con)] expression. This was presumably because RecA4142 was loaded at a double-strand end (DSE) of DNA. Herein, it is shown that recA4142 SOS(Con) expression is additionally dependent on ruvAB (replication fork reversal [RFR] activity only) and recJ (5{\textquoteright}-->3{\textquoteright} exonuclease), xonA (3{\textquoteright}-->5{\textquoteright} exonuclease) and partially dependent on recQ (helicase). Lastly, sbcCD mutations (Mre11/Rad50 homolog) in recA4142 strains caused full SOS(Con) expression in an ruvAB-, recBCD-, recJ-, and xonA-independent manner. It is hypothesized that RuvAB catalyzes RFR, RecJ and XonA blunt the DSE (created by the RFR), and then RecBCD loads RecA4142 onto this end to produce SOS(Con) expression. In sbcCD mutants, RecA4142 can bind other DNA substrates by itself that are normally degraded by the SbcCD nuclease.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonuclease V, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Exonucleases, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01623-09},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Massoni, Shawn C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {810,
	title = {Differential requirements of two recA mutants for constitutive SOS expression in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {PLoS One},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {e4100},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: Repairing DNA damage begins with its detection and is often followed by elicitation of a cellular response. In E. coli, RecA polymerizes on ssDNA produced after DNA damage and induces the SOS Response. The RecA-DNA filament is an allosteric effector of LexA auto-proteolysis. LexA is the repressor of the SOS Response. Not all RecA-DNA filaments, however, lead to an SOS Response. Certain recA mutants express the SOS Response (recA(C)) in the absence of external DNA damage in log phase cells.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Genetic analysis of two recA(C) mutants was used to determine the mechanism of constitutive SOS (SOS(C)) expression in a population of log phase cells using fluorescence of single cells carrying an SOS reporter system (sulAp-gfp). SOS(C) expression in recA4142 mutants was dependent on its initial level of transcription, recBCD, recFOR, recX, dinI, xthA and the type of medium in which the cells were grown. SOS(C) expression in recA730 mutants was affected by none of the mutations or conditions tested above.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: It is concluded that not all recA(C) alleles cause SOS(C) expression by the same mechanism. It is hypothesized that RecA4142 is loaded on to a double-strand end of DNA and that the RecA filament is stabilized by the presence of DinI and destabilized by RecX. RecFOR regulate the activity of RecX to destabilize the RecA filament. RecA730 causes SOS(C) expression by binding to ssDNA in a mechanism yet to be determined.},
	keywords = {Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Models, Biological, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1932-6203},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0004100},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Renzette, Nicholas and Centore, Richard C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
