@article {802,
	title = {Factors Limiting SOS Expression in Log-Phase Cells of Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {194},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012 Oct},
	pages = {5325-33},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, RecA-single-stranded DNA (RecA-ssDNA) filaments catalyze DNA repair, recombination, and induction of the SOS response. It has been shown that, while many (15 to 25\%) log-phase cells have RecA filaments, few (about 1\%) are induced for SOS. It is hypothesized that RecA{\textquoteright}s ability to induce SOS expression in log-phase cells is repressed because of the potentially detrimental effects of SOS mutagenesis. To test this, mutations were sought to produce a population where the number of cells with SOS expression more closely equaled the number of RecA filaments. Here, it is shown that deleting radA (important for resolution of recombination structures) and increasing recA transcription 2- to 3-fold with a recAo1403 operator mutation act independently to minimally satisfy this condition. This allows 24\% of mutant cells to have elevated levels of SOS expression, a percentage similar to that of cells with RecA-green fluorescent protein (RecA-GFP) foci. In an xthA (exonuclease III gene) mutant where there are 3-fold more RecA loading events, recX (a destabilizer of RecA filaments) must be additionally deleted to achieve a population of cells where the percentage having elevated SOS expression (91\%) nearly equals the percentage with at least one RecA-GFP focus (83\%). It is proposed that, in the xthA mutant, there are three independent mechanisms that repress SOS expression in log-phase cells. These are the rapid processing of RecA filaments by RadA, maintaining the concentration of RecA below a critical level, and the destabilizing of RecA filaments by RecX. Only the first two mechanisms operate independently in a wild-type cell.},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.00674-12},
	author = {Massoni, Shawn C and Leeson, Michael C and Long, Jarukit Edward and Gemme, Kristin and Mui, Alice and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {805,
	title = {Structure of the SSB-DNA polymerase III interface and its role in DNA replication.},
	journal = {EMBO J},
	volume = {30},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011 Oct 19},
	pages = {4236-47},
	abstract = {Interactions between single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) and the DNA replication machinery are found in all organisms, but the roles of these contacts remain poorly defined. In Escherichia coli, SSB{\textquoteright}s association with the χ subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme has been proposed to confer stability to the replisome and to aid delivery of primers to the lagging-strand DNA polymerase. Here, the SSB-binding site on χ is identified crystallographically and biochemical and cellular studies delineate the consequences of destabilizing the χ/SSB interface. An essential role for the χ/SSB interaction in lagging-strand primer utilization is not supported. However, sequence changes in χ that block complex formation with SSB lead to salt-dependent uncoupling of leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis and to a surprising obstruction of the leading-strand DNA polymerase in vitro, pointing to roles for the χ/SSB complex in replisome establishment and maintenance. Destabilization of the χ/SSB complex in vivo produces cells with temperature-dependent cell cycle defects that appear to arise from replisome instability.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, DNA Polymerase III, DNA Replication, DNA, Single-Stranded, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Holoenzymes, Molecular Sequence Data},
	issn = {1460-2075},
	doi = {10.1038/emboj.2011.305},
	author = {Marceau, Aimee H and Bahng, Soon and Massoni, Shawn C and George, Nicholas P and Sandler, Steven J and Marians, Kenneth J and Keck, James L}
}
@article {806,
	title = {RecA4142 causes SOS constitutive expression by loading onto reversed replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {192},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 May},
	pages = {2575-82},
	abstract = {Escherichia coli initiates the SOS response when single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by DNA damage is bound by RecA and forms a RecA-DNA filament. recA SOS constitutive [recA(Con)] mutants induce the SOS response in the absence of DNA damage. It has been proposed that recA(Con) mutants bind to ssDNA at replication forks, although the specific mechanism is unknown. Previously, it had been shown that recA4142(F217Y), a novel recA(Con) mutant, was dependent on RecBCD for its high SOS constitutive [SOS(Con)] expression. This was presumably because RecA4142 was loaded at a double-strand end (DSE) of DNA. Herein, it is shown that recA4142 SOS(Con) expression is additionally dependent on ruvAB (replication fork reversal [RFR] activity only) and recJ (5{\textquoteright}-->3{\textquoteright} exonuclease), xonA (3{\textquoteright}-->5{\textquoteright} exonuclease) and partially dependent on recQ (helicase). Lastly, sbcCD mutations (Mre11/Rad50 homolog) in recA4142 strains caused full SOS(Con) expression in an ruvAB-, recBCD-, recJ-, and xonA-independent manner. It is hypothesized that RuvAB catalyzes RFR, RecJ and XonA blunt the DSE (created by the RFR), and then RecBCD loads RecA4142 onto this end to produce SOS(Con) expression. In sbcCD mutants, RecA4142 can bind other DNA substrates by itself that are normally degraded by the SbcCD nuclease.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonuclease V, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Exonucleases, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01623-09},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Massoni, Shawn C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
