@article {826,
	title = {Effects of mutations involving cell division, recombination, and chromosome dimer resolution on a priA2::kan mutant.},
	journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A},
	volume = {98},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Jul 17},
	pages = {8203-10},
	abstract = {Recombinational repair of replication forks can occur either to a crossover (XO) or noncrossover (non-XO) depending on Holliday junction resolution. Once the fork is repaired by recombination, PriA is important for restarting these forks in Escherichia coli. PriA mutants are Rec(-) and UV sensitive and have poor viability and 10-fold elevated basal levels of SOS expression. PriA sulB mutant cells and their nucleoids were studied by differential interference contrast and fluorescence microscopy of 4{\textquoteright},6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-stained log phase cells. Two populations of cells were seen. Eighty four percent appeared like wild type, and 16\% of the cells were filamented and had poorly partitioned chromosomes (Par(-)). To probe potential mechanisms leading to the two populations of cells, mutations were added to the priA sulB mutant. Mutating sulA or introducing lexA3 decreased, but did not eliminate filamentation or defects in partitioning. Mutating either recA or recB virtually eliminated the Par(-) phenotype. Filamentation in the recB mutant decreased to 3\%, but increased to 28\% in the recA mutant. The ability to resolve and/or branch migrate Holliday junctions also appeared crucial in the priA mutant because removing either recG or ruvC was lethal. Lastly, it was tested whether the ability to resolve chromosome dimers caused by XOs was important in a priA mutant by mutating dif and the C-terminal portion of ftsK. Mutation of dif showed no change in phenotype whereas ftsK1cat was lethal with priA2kan. A model is proposed where the PriA-independent pathway of replication restart functions at forks that have been repaired to non-XOs.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, Bacterial Proteins, Cell Division, Chromosomes, Bacterial, Dimerization, DNA Helicases, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonuclease V, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Gene Expression, Membrane Proteins, Mutagenesis, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0027-8424},
	doi = {10.1073/pnas.121007698},
	author = {McCool, J D and Sandler, S J}
}
@article {834,
	title = {Evolutionary comparisons of RecA-like proteins across all major kingdoms of living organisms.},
	journal = {J Mol Evol},
	volume = {44},
	year = {1997},
	month = {1997 May},
	pages = {528-41},
	abstract = {Protein sequences with similarities to Escherichia coli RecA were compared across the major kingdoms of eubacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes. The archaeal sequences branch monophyletically and are most closely related to the eukaryotic paralogous Rad51 and Dmc1 groups. A multiple alignment of the sequences suggests a modular structure of RecA-like proteins consisting of distinct segments, some of which are conserved only within subgroups of sequences. The eukaryotic and archaeal sequences share an N-terminal domain which may play a role in interactions with other factors and nucleic acids. Several positions in the alignment blocks are highly conserved within the eubacteria as one group and within the eukaryotes and archaebacteria as a second group, but compared between the groups these positions display nonconservative amino acid substitutions. Conservation within the RecA-like core domain identifies possible key residues involved in ATP-induced conformational changes. We propose that RecA-like proteins derive evolutionarily from an assortment of independent domains and that the functional homologs of RecA in noneubacteria comprise an array of RecA-like proteins acting in series or cooperatively.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Archaeal Proteins, Bacteria, Bacterial Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, Consensus Sequence, Conserved Sequence, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Rad51 Recombinase, Rec A Recombinases, Sequence Alignment},
	issn = {0022-2844},
	author = {Brendel, V and Brocchieri, L and Sandler, S J and Clark, A J and Karlin, S}
}
