@article {825,
	title = {PriA mutations that affect PriA-PriC function during replication restart.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {41},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Aug},
	pages = {697-704},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, repair and restart of collapsed replication forks is thought to be essential for cell growth. The replication restart proteins, PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaB, DnaC, DnaG, DnaT and Rep, form redundant pathways that recognize repaired replication forks and restart them. Recognition, modulation of specific DNA structures and loading of the replicative helicase by the replication restart proteins, is likely to be important for replication restart. It has been hypothesized that PriB and PriC function with PriA in genetically separate and redundant PriA-PriB and PriA-PriC pathways. In this study, the del(priB)302 or priC303:kan mutations were used to isolate the PriA-PriB and PriA-PriC pathways genetically so that the effects of three priA missense mutations, priA300 (K230R), priA301 (C479Y) and priA306 (L557P), on these pathways could be assessed. In a wild-type background, the three priA mutations had little, if any, effect on the phenotypes of UV resistance, basal levels of SOS expression and cell viability. In the priB mutant, priA300 and priA301 caused dramatic negative changes in the three phenotypes listed above (and others), whereas the third priA mutant allele, priA306, showed very little negative effect. In the priC mutant, all three priA mutations behaved similarly, producing little, if any, changes in phenotypes. We conclude that priA300 and priA301 mostly affect the PriA-PriC pathway and do so more than priA306. We suggest that PriA{\textquoteright}s helicase activity is important for the PriA-PriC pathway of replication restart.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophage mu, Cell Division, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Lethal, Genotype, Models, Biological, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Replication Protein A, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Sandler, S J and McCool, J D and Do, T T and Johansen, R U}
}
@article {836,
	title = {Differential suppression of priA2::kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {143},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996 May},
	pages = {5-13},
	abstract = {First identified as an essential component of the phi X174 in vitro DNA replication system, PriA has ATPase, helicase, translocase, and primosome-assembly activities. priA1::kan strains of Escherichia coli are sensitive to UV irradiation, deficient in homologous recombination following transduction, and filamentous. priA2::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression than wild type. We show that (1) priA1::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression, (2) priA2::kan strains are UVS and Rec-, (3) lexA3 suppresses the high basal levels of SOS expression of a priA2::kan strain, and (4) plasmid-encoded priA300 (K230R), a mutant allele retaining only the primosome-assembly activity of priA+, restores both UVR and Rec+ phenotypes to a priA2::kan strain. Finally, we have isolated 17 independent UVR Rec+ revertants of priA2::kan strains that carry extragenic suppressors. All 17 map in the C-terminal half of the dnaC gene. DnaC loads the DnaB helicase onto DNA as a prelude for primosome assembly and DNA replication. We conclude that priA{\textquoteright}s primosome-assembly activity is essential for DNA repair and recombination and that the dnaC suppressor mutations allow these processes to occur in the absence of priA.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophage phi X 174, beta-Galactosidase, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Bacterial, Genetic Markers, Mutagenesis, Phenotype, Recombination, Genetic, Replication Protein A, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, Suppression, Genetic, Transduction, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Samra, H S and Clark, A J}
}
@article {837,
	title = {Overlapping functions for recF and priA in cell viability and UV-inducible SOS expression are distinguished by dnaC809 in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {19},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996 Feb},
	pages = {871-80},
	abstract = {The recF and priA genes have roles in DNA repair and homologous recombination. Mutations in these genes also cause decreases in cell viability and alterations in UV-inducible sulAp-lacZ (SOS) expression. To find out if the two genes are in the same or different pathways for viability and SOS expression, the phenotypes of the double mutant strains were studied. The recF priA double mutant showed a lower viability and SOS expression level than either of the single mutants. In the case of cell viability, recF missense mutations decreased viability of a priA2::kan strain two to five-fold whereas recF null priA2::kan double mutants were not viable at all. dnaC809, a mutation that suppresses the UV-sensitive (UVs and Rec- phenotypes of priA2::kan, restored cell viability, but not UV-inducible SOS expression, to a priA recF strain. Since recF is epistatic with recO and recR (recOR) for UV resistance, recOR mutations were also tested with priA2::kan. No overlap was found between recOR and priA for viability and SOS expression. It is concluded that priA and recF have two different overlapping functions in viability and SOS expression that are distinguishable by the effects of dnaC809. The role of recF in a priA2::kan strain in cell viability is a new function for recF and unlike recF{\textquoteright}s other roles in DNA repair and recombination, is independent of recOR. A new role for priA in UV-inducible SOS expression in a recF mutant is also defined.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Bacterial, Lac Operon, Mutation, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Replication Protein A, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Sandler, S J}
}
@article {838,
	title = {recO and recR mutations delay induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {Mol Gen Genet},
	volume = {246},
	year = {1995},
	month = {1995 Jan 20},
	pages = {254-8},
	abstract = {RecF, RecO and RecR, three of the important proteins of the RecF pathway of recombination, are also needed for repair of DNA damage due to UV irradiation. recF mutants are not proficient in cleaving LexA repressor in vivo following DNA damage: therefore they show a delay of induction of the SOS response. In this communication, by measuring the in vivo levels of LexA repressor using anti-LexA antibodies, we show that recO and recR mutant strains are also not proficient in LexA cleavage reactions. In addition, we show that recO and recR mutations delay induction of beta-galactosidase activity expressed from a lexA-regulated promoter following exposure of cells to UV, thus further supporting the idea that recF, recO and recR gene products are needed for induction of the SOS response.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, beta-Galactosidase, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0026-8925},
	author = {Hegde, S and Sandler, S J and Clark, A J and Madiraju, M V}
}
@article {841,
	title = {RecOR suppression of recF mutant phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {176},
	year = {1994},
	month = {1994 Jun},
	pages = {3661-72},
	abstract = {The recF, recO, and recR genes form the recFOR epistasis group for DNA repair. recF mutants are sensitive to UV irradiation and fail to properly induce the SOS response. Using plasmid derivatives that overexpress combinations of the recO+ and recR+ genes, we tested the hypothesis that high-level expression of recO+ and recR+ (recOR) in vivo will indirectly suppress the recF mutant phenotypes mentioned above. We found that overexpression of just recR+ from the plasmid will partially suppress both phenotypes. Expression of the chromosomal recO+ gene is essential for the recR+ suppression. Hence we call this RecOR suppression of recF mutant phenotypes. RecOR suppression of SOS induction is more efficient with recO+ expression from a plasmid than with recO+ expression from the chromosome. This is not true for RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity (the two are equal). Comparison of RecOR suppression with the suppression caused by recA801 and recA803 shows that RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity is more effective than recA803 suppression and that RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity, like recA801 suppression, requires recJ+. We present a model that explains the data and proposes a function for the recFOR epistasis group in the induction of the SOS response and recombinational DNA repair.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Epistasis, Genetic, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenotype, Plasmids, SOS Response (Genetics), Suppression, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Clark, A J}
}
@article {839,
	title = {Studies on the mechanism of reduction of UV-inducible sulAp expression by recF overexpression in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Gen Genet},
	volume = {245},
	year = {1994},
	month = {1994 Dec 15},
	pages = {741-9},
	abstract = {UV-inducible sulAp expression, an indicator of the SOS response, is reduced by recF+ overexpression in vivo. Different DNA-damaging agents and amounts of RecO and RecR were tested for their effects on this phenotype. It was found that recF+ overexpression reduced sulAp expression after DNA damage by mitomycin C or nalidixic acid, recO+ and recR+ overexpression partially suppressed the reduction of UV-induced sulAp expression caused by recF+ overexpression. The requirement for ATP binding to RecF to produce the phenotype was tested by genetically altering the putative phosphate binding cleft of recF in a way that should prevent the mutant recF protein from binding ATP. It was found that a change of lysine to glutamine at codon 36 results in a mutant recF protein (RecF4115) that is unable to reduce UV-inducible sulAp expression when overproduced. It is inferred from these results that recF overexpression may reduce UV-inducible sulAp expression by a mechanism that is sensitive to the ability of RecF to bind ATP and to the levels of RecO and RecR (RecOR) in the cell, but not to the type of DNA damage per se. Models are explored that can explain how recF+ overexpression reduces UV induction of sulAp and how RecOR overproduction might suppress this phenotype.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, DNA Primers, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Restriction Mapping, RNA, Messenger, SOS Response (Genetics), Structure-Activity Relationship, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0026-8925},
	author = {Sandler, S J}
}
@article {843,
	title = {Use of high and low level overexpression plasmids to test mutant alleles of the recF gene of Escherichia coli K-12 for partial activity.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {135},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993 Nov},
	pages = {643-54},
	abstract = {We showed that sufficient overexpression of the wild-type recF gene interfered with three normal cell functions: (1) UV induction of transcription from the LexA-protein-repressed sulA promoter, (2) UV resistance and (3) cell viability at 42 degrees. To show this, we altered a low-level overexpressing recF+ plasmid with a set of structurally neutral mutations that increased the rate of expression of recF. The resulting high-level overexpressing plasmid interfered with UV induction of the sulA promoter, as did the low-level overexpressing plasmid. It also reduced UV resistance more than its low level progenitor and decreased viability at 42 degrees, an effect not seen with the low-level plasmid. We used the high-level plasmid to test four recF structural mutations for residual activity. The structural alleles consisted of an insertion mutation, two single amino acid substitution mutations and a double amino acid substitution mutation. On the Escherichia coli chromosome the three substitution mutations acted similarly to a recF deletion in reducing UV resistance in a recB21 recC22 sbcB15 sbcC201 genetic background. By this test, therefore, all three appeared to be null alleles. Measurements of conjugational recombination revealed, however, that the three substitution mutations may have residual activity. On the high-level overexpressing plasmid all three substitution mutations definitely showed partial activity. By contrast, the insertion mutation on the high-level overexpressing plasmid showed no partial activity and can be considered a true null mutation. One of the substitutions, recF143, showed a property attributable to a leaky mutation. Another substitution, recF4101, may block selectively two of the three interference phenotypes, thus allowing us to infer a mechanism for them.},
	keywords = {Alleles, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression, Genes, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Mutation, Phenotype, Plasmids, Radiation Tolerance, Recombination, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Clark, A J}
}
