@article {806,
	title = {RecA4142 causes SOS constitutive expression by loading onto reversed replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {192},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 May},
	pages = {2575-82},
	abstract = {Escherichia coli initiates the SOS response when single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by DNA damage is bound by RecA and forms a RecA-DNA filament. recA SOS constitutive [recA(Con)] mutants induce the SOS response in the absence of DNA damage. It has been proposed that recA(Con) mutants bind to ssDNA at replication forks, although the specific mechanism is unknown. Previously, it had been shown that recA4142(F217Y), a novel recA(Con) mutant, was dependent on RecBCD for its high SOS constitutive [SOS(Con)] expression. This was presumably because RecA4142 was loaded at a double-strand end (DSE) of DNA. Herein, it is shown that recA4142 SOS(Con) expression is additionally dependent on ruvAB (replication fork reversal [RFR] activity only) and recJ (5{\textquoteright}-->3{\textquoteright} exonuclease), xonA (3{\textquoteright}-->5{\textquoteright} exonuclease) and partially dependent on recQ (helicase). Lastly, sbcCD mutations (Mre11/Rad50 homolog) in recA4142 strains caused full SOS(Con) expression in an ruvAB-, recBCD-, recJ-, and xonA-independent manner. It is hypothesized that RuvAB catalyzes RFR, RecJ and XonA blunt the DSE (created by the RFR), and then RecBCD loads RecA4142 onto this end to produce SOS(Con) expression. In sbcCD mutants, RecA4142 can bind other DNA substrates by itself that are normally degraded by the SbcCD nuclease.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonuclease V, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Exonucleases, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01623-09},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Massoni, Shawn C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {809,
	title = {Single molecule analysis of a red fluorescent RecA protein reveals a defect in nucleoprotein filament nucleation that relates to its reduced biological functions.},
	journal = {J Biol Chem},
	volume = {284},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Jul 10},
	pages = {18664-73},
	abstract = {Fluorescent fusion proteins are exceedingly useful for monitoring protein localization in situ or visualizing protein behavior at the single molecule level. Unfortunately, some proteins are rendered inactive by the fusion. To circumvent this problem, we fused a hyperactive RecA protein (RecA803 protein) to monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP1) to produce a functional protein (RecA-RFP) that is suitable for in vivo and in vitro analysis. In vivo, the RecA-RFP partially restores UV resistance, conjugational recombination, and SOS induction to recA(-) cells. In vitro, the purified RecA-RFP protein forms a nucleoprotein filament whose k(cat) for single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activity is reduced approximately 3-fold relative to wild-type protein, and which is largely inhibited by single-stranded DNA-binding protein. However, RecA protein is also a dATPase; dATP supports RecA-RFP nucleoprotein filament formation in the presence of single-stranded DNA-binding protein. Furthermore, as for the wild-type protein, the activities of RecA-RFP are further enhanced by shifting the pH to 6.2. As a consequence, RecA-RFP is proficient for DNA strand exchange with dATP or at lower pH. Finally, using single molecule visualization, RecA-RFP was seen to assemble into a continuous filament on duplex DNA, and to extend the DNA approximately 1.7-fold. Consistent with its attenuated activities, RecA-RFP nucleates onto double-stranded DNA approximately 3-fold more slowly than the wild-type protein, but still requires approximately 3 monomers to form the rate-limited nucleus needed for filament assembly. Thus, RecA-RFP reveals that its attenuated biological functions correlate with a reduced frequency of nucleoprotein filament nucleation at the single molecule level.},
	keywords = {Cell Nucleus, DNA, DNA, Single-Stranded, Escherichia coli, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Kinetics, Luminescent Proteins, Nucleoproteins, Plasmids, Protein Binding, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0021-9258},
	doi = {10.1074/jbc.M109.004895},
	author = {Handa, Naofumi and Amitani, Ichiro and Gumlaw, Nathan and Sandler, Steven J and Kowalczykowski, Stephen C}
}
@article {808,
	title = {Suppression of constitutive SOS expression by recA4162 (I298V) and recA4164 (L126V) requires UvrD and RecX in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {73},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Jul},
	pages = {226-39},
	abstract = {Sensing DNA damage and initiation of genetic responses to repair DNA damage are critical to cell survival. In Escherichia coli, RecA polymerizes on ssDNA produced by DNA damage creating a RecA-DNA filament that interacts with the LexA repressor inducing the SOS response. RecA filament stability is negatively modulated by RecX and UvrD. recA730 (E38K) and recA4142 (F217Y) constitutively express the SOS response. recA4162 (I298V) and recA4164 (L126V) are intragenic suppressors of the constitutive SOS phenotype of recA730. Herein, it is shown that these suppressors are not allele specific and can suppress SOS(C) expression of recA730 and recA4142 in cis and in trans. recA4162 and recA4164 single mutants (and the recA730 and recA4142 derivatives) are Rec(+), UV(R) and are able to induce the SOS response after UV treatment like wild-type. UvrD and RecX are required for the suppression in two (recA730,4164 and recA4142,4162) of the four double mutants tested. To explain the data, one model suggests that recA(C) alleles promote SOS(C) expression by mimicking RecA filament structures that induce SOS and the suppressor alleles mimic RecA filament at end of SOS. UvrD and RecX are attracted to these latter structures to help dismantle or destabilize the RecA filament.},
	keywords = {Alleles, DNA Helicases, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Missense, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics), Substrate Specificity},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06765.x},
	author = {Long, Jarukit E and Renzette, Nicholas and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {811,
	title = {UvrD303, a hyperhelicase mutant that antagonizes RecA-dependent SOS expression by a mechanism that depends on its C terminus.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {191},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Mar},
	pages = {1429-38},
	abstract = {Genomic integrity is critical for an organism{\textquoteright}s survival and ability to reproduce. In Escherichia coli, the UvrD helicase has roles in nucleotide excision repair and methyl-directed mismatch repair and can limit reactions by RecA under certain circumstances. UvrD303 (D403A D404A) is a hyperhelicase mutant, and when expressed from a multicopy plasmid, it results in UV sensitivity (UV(s)), recombination deficiency, and antimutability. In order to understand the molecular mechanism underlying the UV(s) phenotype of uvrD303 cells, this mutation was transferred to the E. coli chromosome and studied in single copy. It is shown here that uvrD303 mutants are UV sensitive, recombination deficient, and antimutable and additionally have a moderate defect in inducing the SOS response after UV treatment. The UV-sensitive phenotype is epistatic with recA and additive with uvrA and is partially suppressed by removing the LexA repressor. Furthermore, uvrD303 is able to inhibit constitutive SOS expression caused by the recA730 mutation. The ability of UvrD303 to antagonize SOS expression was dependent on its 40 C-terminal amino acids. It is proposed that UvrD303, via its C terminus, can decrease the levels of RecA activity in the cell.},
	keywords = {DNA Helicases, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01415-08},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Leeson, Michael C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {810,
	title = {Differential requirements of two recA mutants for constitutive SOS expression in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {PLoS One},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {e4100},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: Repairing DNA damage begins with its detection and is often followed by elicitation of a cellular response. In E. coli, RecA polymerizes on ssDNA produced after DNA damage and induces the SOS Response. The RecA-DNA filament is an allosteric effector of LexA auto-proteolysis. LexA is the repressor of the SOS Response. Not all RecA-DNA filaments, however, lead to an SOS Response. Certain recA mutants express the SOS Response (recA(C)) in the absence of external DNA damage in log phase cells.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Genetic analysis of two recA(C) mutants was used to determine the mechanism of constitutive SOS (SOS(C)) expression in a population of log phase cells using fluorescence of single cells carrying an SOS reporter system (sulAp-gfp). SOS(C) expression in recA4142 mutants was dependent on its initial level of transcription, recBCD, recFOR, recX, dinI, xthA and the type of medium in which the cells were grown. SOS(C) expression in recA730 mutants was affected by none of the mutations or conditions tested above.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: It is concluded that not all recA(C) alleles cause SOS(C) expression by the same mechanism. It is hypothesized that RecA4142 is loaded on to a double-strand end of DNA and that the RecA filament is stabilized by the presence of DinI and destabilized by RecX. RecFOR regulate the activity of RecX to destabilize the RecA filament. RecA730 causes SOS(C) expression by binding to ssDNA in a mechanism yet to be determined.},
	keywords = {Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Models, Biological, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1932-6203},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0004100},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Renzette, Nicholas and Centore, Richard C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {812,
	title = {RecA-mediated SOS induction requires an extended filament conformation but no ATP hydrolysis.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {69},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Sep},
	pages = {1165-79},
	abstract = {The Escherichia coli SOS response to DNA damage is modulated by the RecA protein, a recombinase that forms an extended filament on single-stranded DNA and hydrolyzes ATP. The RecA K72R (recA2201) mutation eliminates the ATPase activity of RecA protein. The mutation also limits the capacity of RecA to form long filaments in the presence of ATP. Strains with this mutation do not undergo SOS induction in vivo. We have combined the K72R variant of RecA with another mutation, RecA E38K (recA730). In vitro, the double mutant RecA E38K/K72R (recA730,2201) mimics the K72R mutant protein in that it has no ATPase activity. The double mutant protein will form long extended filaments on ssDNA and facilitate LexA cleavage almost as well as wild-type, and do so in the presence of ATP. Unlike recA K72R, the recA E38K/K72R double mutant promotes SOS induction in vivo after UV treatment. Thus, SOS induction does not require ATP hydrolysis by the RecA protein, but does require formation of extended RecA filaments. The RecA E38K/K72R protein represents an improved reagent for studies of the function of ATP hydrolysis by RecA in vivo and in vitro.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphate, Amino Acid Substitution, Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Single-Stranded, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Hydrolysis, Rec A Recombinases, Serine Endopeptidases, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06341.x},
	author = {Gruenig, Marielle C and Renzette, Nicholas and Long, Edward and Chitteni-Pattu, Sindhu and Inman, Ross B and Cox, Michael M and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {813,
	title = {Requirements for ATP binding and hydrolysis in RecA function in Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {67},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Mar},
	pages = {1347-59},
	abstract = {RecA is essential for recombination, DNA repair and SOS induction in Escherichia coli. ATP hydrolysis is known to be important for RecA{\textquoteright}s roles in recombination and DNA repair. In vitro reactions modelling SOS induction minimally require ssDNA and non-hydrolyzable ATP analogues. This predicts that ATP hydrolysis will not be required for SOS induction in vivo. The requirement of ATP binding and hydrolysis for SOS induction in vivo is tested here through the study of recA4159 (K72A) and recA2201 (K72R). RecA4159 is thought to have reduced affinity for ATP. RecA2201 binds, but does not hydrolyse ATP. Neither mutant was able to induce SOS expression after UV irradiation. RecA2201, unlike RecA4159, could form filaments on DNA and storage structures as measured with RecA-GFP. RecA2201 was able to form hybrid filaments and storage structures and was either recessive or dominant to RecA(+), depending on the ratio of the two proteins. RecA4159 was unable to enter RecA(+) filaments on DNA or storage structures and was recessive to RecA(+). It is concluded that ATP hydrolysis is essential for SOS induction. It is proposed that ATP binding is essential for storage structure formation and ability to interact with other RecA proteins in a filament.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphate, Chromosomes, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Hydrolysis, Mutation, Protein Binding, Rec A Recombinases, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06130.x},
	author = {Renzette, Nicholas and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {814,
	title = {XthA (Exonuclease III) regulates loading of RecA onto DNA substrates in log phase Escherichia coli cells.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {67},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Jan},
	pages = {88-101},
	abstract = {Exonucleases can modify DNA substrates created during DNA replication, recombination and repair. In Escherichia coli, the effects of several 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} exonucleases on RecA loading were studied by assaying RecA-GFP foci formation. Mutations in xthA (ExoIII), xseAB (ExoVII), xni (ExoIX), exoX (ExoX) and tatD (ExoXI) increased the number of RecA-GFP foci twofold to threefold in a population of log phase cells grown in minimal medium. These increases depend on xonA. Epistasis analysis shows that ExoVII, ExoX, ExoIX and ExoXI function in a common pathway, distinct from ExoIII (and ExoI is upstream of both pathways). It is shown (paradoxically) that in xthA mutants, RecA-GFP loading is predominantly RecBCD-dependent and that xthA recB double mutants are viable. Experiments show that while log phase xthA cells have twofold more double-stranded breaks (DSBs) than wild type, they do not induce the SOS response. The increase in RecA loading is independent of the base excision repair (BER) proteins Nth, MutM and Nei. It is proposed that log phase cells produce DSBs that do not induce the SOS response. Furthermore, ExoI, ExoIII and the other 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} exonucleases process these DSBs, antagonizing the RecBCD pathway of RecA loading, thus regulating the availability of these substrates for recombination.},
	keywords = {DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, Epistasis, Genetic, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Microbial Viability, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06026.x},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Lestini, Roxane and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {818,
	title = {DinI and RecX modulate RecA-DNA structures in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {63},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Jan},
	pages = {103-15},
	abstract = {RecA plays a central role in recombination, DNA repair and SOS induction through forming a RecA-DNA helical filament. Biochemical observations show that at low ratios to RecA, DinI and RecX stabilize and destabilize RecA-DNA filaments, respectively, and that the C-terminal 17 residues of RecA are important for RecX function. RecA-DNA filament formation was assayed in vivo using RecA-GFP foci formation in log-phase and UV-irradiated cells. In log-phase cells, dinI mutants have fewer foci than wild type and that recX mutants have more foci than wild type. A recADelta17::gfp mutant had more foci like a recX mutant. dinI recX double mutants have the same number of foci as dinI mutants alone, suggesting that dinI is epistatic to recX. After UV treatment, the dinI, recX and dinI recX mutants differed in their ability to form foci. All three mutants had fewer foci than wild type. The dinI mutant{\textquoteright}s foci persisted longer than wild-type foci. Roles of DinI and RecX after UV treatment differed from those during log-phase growth and may reflect the different DNA substrates, population of proteins or amounts during the SOS response. These experiments give new insight into the roles of these proteins.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Rec A Recombinases},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05496.x},
	author = {Renzette, Nicholas and Gumlaw, Nathan and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {817,
	title = {UvrD limits the number and intensities of RecA-green fluorescent protein structures in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {189},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Apr},
	pages = {2915-20},
	abstract = {RecA is important for recombination, DNA repair, and SOS induction. In Escherichia coli, RecBCD, RecFOR, and RecJQ prepare DNA substrates onto which RecA binds. UvrD is a 3{\textquoteright}-to-5{\textquoteright} helicase that participates in methyl-directed mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair. uvrD deletion mutants are sensitive to UV irradiation, hypermutable, and hyper-rec. In vitro, UvrD can dissociate RecA from single-stranded DNA. Other experiments suggest that UvrD removes RecA from DNA where it promotes unproductive reactions. To test if UvrD limits the number and/or the size of RecA-DNA structures in vivo, an uvrD mutation was combined with recA-gfp. This recA allele allows the number of RecA structures and the amount of RecA at these structures to be assayed in living cells. uvrD mutants show a threefold increase in the number of RecA-GFP foci, and these foci are, on average, nearly twofold higher in relative intensity. The increased number of RecA-green fluorescent protein foci in the uvrD mutant is dependent on recF, recO, recR, recJ, and recQ. The increase in average relative intensity is dependent on recO and recQ. These data support an in vivo role for UvrD in removing RecA from the DNA.},
	keywords = {DNA Helicases, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01777-06},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {820,
	title = {Localization of RecA in Escherichia coli K-12 using RecA-GFP.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {57},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Aug},
	pages = {1074-85},
	abstract = {RecA is important in recombination, DNA repair and repair of replication forks. It functions through the production of a protein-DNA filament. To study the localization of RecA in live Escherichia coli cells, the RecA protein was fused to the green fluorescence protein (GFP). Strains with this gene have recombination/DNA repair activities three- to tenfold below wild type (or about 1000-fold above that of a recA null mutant). RecA-GFP cells have a background of green fluorescence punctuated with up to five foci per cell. Two types of foci have been defined: 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-sensitive foci that are bound to DNA and DAPI-insensitive foci that are DNA-less aggregates/storage structures. In log phase cells, foci were not localized to any particular region. After UV irradiation, the number of foci increased and they localized to the cell centre. This suggested colocalization with the DNA replication factory. recA, recB and recF strains showed phenotypes and distributions of foci consistent with the predicted effects of these mutations.},
	keywords = {Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Replication, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04755.x},
	author = {Renzette, Nicholas and Gumlaw, Nathan and Nordman, Jared T and Krieger, Marlee and Yeh, Su-Ping and Long, Edward and Centore, Richard and Boonsombat, Ruethairat and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {821,
	title = {Requirements for replication restart proteins during constitutive stable DNA replication in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {169},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Apr},
	pages = {1799-806},
	abstract = {Constitutive stable DNA replication (cSDR) is a mechanism for replisome loading in Escherichia coli K-12. This occurs in a dnaA-independent fashion in an rnhA mutant. cSDR is dependent on recA, priA, and transcription. In this report, it is shown that dnaA rnhA mutants using cSDR for initiation of their DNA replication additionally require priB, but not priC, for viability. Two subtle priA missense mutations either eliminated the ability to grow using cSDR (priA301 C479Y) or resulted in very small colonies (priA300 K230R). DnaC809, a priA suppressor, failed to allow priA or priB mutants to grow using cSDR to initiate DNA replication. Furthermore, unlike dnaC(+) strains, dnaC809 strains require priC for cSDR. DnaC809,820, a priC-independent suppressor of priA2::kan phenotypes, allowed priA and priC (but not priB) mutants to grow using cSDR to initiate DNA replication. It is also shown that rep and rnhA mutations are synthetically lethal. DnaC809 and dnaC809,820 mutations suppress this lethality. Rep is further shown to be required for cSDR in a dnaC809 strain. A model whereby these different sets of replication restart proteins interact preferentially with substrates associated with either RecA or SSB during replication restart and cSDR, respectively, is proposed.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, DNA, DNA Replication, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Macromolecular Substances, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Rec A Recombinases, RNA, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	doi = {10.1534/genetics.104.036962},
	author = {Sandler, Steven J}
}
