@article {482,
	title = {Sustained removal of uranium from contaminated groundwater following stimulation of dissimilatory metal reduction.},
	journal = {Environ Sci Technol},
	volume = {42},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Apr 15},
	pages = {2999-3004},
	abstract = {Previous field studies on in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater in an aquifer in Rifle, Colorado identified two distinct phases following the addition of acetate to stimulate microbial respiration. In phase I, Geobacter species are the predominant organisms, Fe(III) is reduced, and microbial reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) removes uranium from the groundwater. In phase II, Fe(III) is depleted, sulfate is reduced, and sulfate-reducing bacteria predominate. Long-term monitoring revealed an unexpected third phase during which U(VI) removal continues even after acetate additions are stopped. All three of these phases were successfully reproduced in flow-through sediment columns. When sediments from the third phase were heat sterilized, the capacity for U(VI) removal was lost. In the live sediments U(VI) removed from the groundwater was recovered as U(VI) in the sediments. This contrasts to the recovery of U(IV) in sediments resulting from the reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) during the Fe(III) reduction phase in acetate-amended sediments. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences in the sediments in which U(VI) was being adsorbed indicated that members of the Firmicutes were the predominant organisms whereas no Firmicutes sequences were detected in background sediments which did not have the capacity to sorb U(VI), suggesting that the U(VI) adsorption might be due to the presence of these living organisms or at least their intact cell components. This unexpected enhanced adsorption of U(VI) onto sediments following the stimulation of microbial growth in the subsurface may potentially enhance the cost effectiveness of in situ uranium bioremediation.},
	keywords = {Acetates, Adsorption, Bacteria, Colorado, Geologic Sediments, Oxidation-Reduction, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sulfates, Uranium, Water Pollutants, Radioactive, Water Supply},
	issn = {0013-936X},
	author = {N{\textquoteright}guessan, Lucie A and Vrionis, Helen A and Resch, Charles T and Long, Philip E and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {530,
	title = {Microbiological and geochemical heterogeneity in an in situ uranium bioremediation field site.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {71},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Oct},
	pages = {6308-18},
	abstract = {The geochemistry and microbiology of a uranium-contaminated subsurface environment that had undergone two seasons of acetate addition to stimulate microbial U(VI) reduction was examined. There were distinct horizontal and vertical geochemical gradients that could be attributed in large part to the manner in which acetate was distributed in the aquifer, with more reduction of Fe(III) and sulfate occurring at greater depths and closer to the point of acetate injection. Clone libraries of 16S rRNA genes derived from sediments and groundwater indicated an enrichment of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the order Desulfobacterales in sediment and groundwater samples. These samples were collected nearest the injection gallery where microbially reducible Fe(III) oxides were highly depleted, groundwater sulfate concentrations were low, and increases in acid volatile sulfide were observed in the sediment. Further down-gradient, metal-reducing conditions were present as indicated by intermediate Fe(II)/Fe(total) ratios, lower acid volatile sulfide values, and increased abundance of 16S rRNA gene sequences belonging to the dissimilatory Fe(III)- and U(VI)-reducing family Geobacteraceae. Maximal Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction correlated with maximal recovery of Geobacteraceae 16S rRNA gene sequences in both groundwater and sediment; however, the sites at which these maxima occurred were spatially separated within the aquifer. The substantial microbial and geochemical heterogeneity at this site demonstrates that attempts should be made to deliver acetate in a more uniform manner and that closely spaced sampling intervals, horizontally and vertically, in both sediment and groundwater are necessary in order to obtain a more in-depth understanding of microbial processes and the relative contribution of attached and planktonic populations to in situ uranium bioremediation.},
	keywords = {Acetates, Biodegradation, Environmental, Deltaproteobacteria, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Ferric Compounds, Fresh Water, Geologic Sediments, Phylogeny, Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sulfates, Uranium, Water Pollution},
	issn = {0099-2240},
	doi = {10.1128/AEM.71.10.6308-6318.2005},
	author = {Vrionis, Helen A and Anderson, Robert T and Ortiz-Bernad, Irene and O{\textquoteright}Neill, Kathleen R and Resch, Charles T and Peacock, Aaron D and Dayvault, Richard and White, David C and Long, Philip E and Lovley, Derek R}
}
