@article {481,
	title = {Genome-wide gene expression patterns and growth requirements suggest that Pelobacter carbinolicus reduces Fe(III) indirectly via sulfide production.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {74},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Jul},
	pages = {4277-84},
	abstract = {Although Pelobacter species are closely related to Geobacter species, recent studies suggested that Pelobacter carbinolicus may reduce Fe(III) via a different mechanism because it lacks the outer-surface c-type cytochromes that are required for Fe(III) reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Investigation into the mechanisms for Fe(III) reduction demonstrated that P. carbinolicus had growth yields on both soluble and insoluble Fe(III) consistent with those of other Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. Comparison of whole-genome transcript levels during growth on Fe(III) versus fermentative growth demonstrated that the greatest apparent change in gene expression was an increase in transcript levels for four contiguous genes. These genes encode two putative periplasmic thioredoxins; a putative outer-membrane transport protein; and a putative NAD(FAD)-dependent dehydrogenase with homology to disulfide oxidoreductases in the N terminus, rhodanese (sulfurtransferase) in the center, and uncharacterized conserved proteins in the C terminus. Unlike G. sulfurreducens, transcript levels for cytochrome genes did not increase in P. carbinolicus during growth on Fe(III). P. carbinolicus could use sulfate as the sole source of sulfur during fermentative growth, but required elemental sulfur or sulfide for growth on Fe(III). The increased expression of genes potentially involved in sulfur reduction, coupled with the requirement for sulfur or sulfide during growth on Fe(III), suggests that P. carbinolicus reduces Fe(III) via an indirect mechanism in which (i) elemental sulfur is reduced to sulfide and (ii) the sulfide reduces Fe(III) with the regeneration of elemental sulfur. This contrasts with the direct reduction of Fe(III) that has been proposed for Geobacter species.},
	keywords = {Acetoin, Cytochrome c Group, Deltaproteobacteria, Ethanol, Fermentation, Ferric Compounds, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome, Bacterial, Iron, Nitrilotriacetic Acid, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Oxidation-Reduction, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA, Bacterial, Substrate Specificity, Sulfides, Sulfur, Sulfur-Reducing Bacteria, Thioredoxins},
	issn = {1098-5336},
	doi = {10.1128/AEM.02901-07},
	author = {Haveman, Shelley A and Didonato, Raymond J and Villanueva, Laura and Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Postier, Bradley L and Xu, Bo and Liu, Anna and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {484,
	title = {Geobacter uraniireducens sp. nov., isolated from subsurface sediment undergoing uranium bioremediation.},
	journal = {Int J Syst Evol Microbiol},
	volume = {58},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 May},
	pages = {1075-8},
	abstract = {A Gram-negative, rod-shaped, motile bacterium, strain Rf4T, which conserves energy from dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction concomitant with acetate oxidation, was isolated from subsurface sediment undergoing uranium bioremediation. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain Rf4T matched sequences recovered in 16S rRNA gene clone libraries constructed from DNA extracted from groundwater sampled at the same time as the source sediment. Cells of strain Rf4T were regular, motile rods, 1.2-2.0 microm long and 0.5-0.6 microm in diameter, with rounded ends. Cells had one lateral flagellum. Growth was optimal at pH 6.5-7.0 and 32 degrees C. With acetate as the electron donor, strain Rf4T used Fe(III), Mn(IV), anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate, malate and fumarate as electron acceptors and reduced U(VI) in cell suspensions. With poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide as the electron acceptor, strain Rf4T oxidized the following electron donors: acetate, lactate, pyruvate and ethanol. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain Rf4T placed it in the genus Geobacter. Strain Rf4T was most closely related to {\textquoteright}Geobacter humireducens{\textquoteright} JW3 (95.9 \% sequence similarity), Geobacter bremensis Dfr1T (95.4 \%) and Geobacter bemidjiensis BemT (95.1 \%). Based on phylogenetic analysis and phenotypic differences between strain Rf4T and closely related Geobacter species, this strain is described as a representative of a novel species, Geobacter uraniireducens sp. nov. The type strain is Rf4T (=ATCC BAA-1134T =JCM 13001T).},
	keywords = {Bacterial Typing Techniques, DNA, Bacterial, Genes, rRNA, Genotype, Geobacter, Geologic Sediments, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxidation-Reduction, Phenotype, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Species Specificity, Uranium},
	issn = {1466-5026},
	doi = {10.1099/ijs.0.65377-0},
	author = {Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Vrionis, Helen A and Findlay, Robert H and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {497,
	title = {Growth of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms on a ferruginous smectite as the sole electron acceptor.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {74},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Jan},
	pages = {251-8},
	abstract = {Recent studies have suggested that the structural Fe(III) within phyllosilicate minerals, including smectite and illite, is an important electron acceptor for Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in sedimentary environments at moderate temperatures. The reduction of structural Fe(III) by thermophiles, however, has not previously been described. A wide range of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic Archaea and Bacteria from marine and freshwater environments that are known to reduce poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxides were tested for their ability to reduce structural (octahedrally coordinated) Fe(III) in smectite (SWa-1) as the sole electron acceptor. Two out of the 10 organisms tested, Geoglobus ahangari and Geothermobacterium ferrireducens, were not able to conserve energy to support growth by reduction of Fe(III) in SWa-1 despite the fact that both organisms were originally isolated with solid-phase Fe(III) as the electron acceptor. The other organisms tested were able to grow on SWa-1 and reduced 6.3 to 15.1\% of the Fe(III). This is 20 to 50\% less than the reported amounts of Fe(III) reduced in the same smectite (SWa-1) by mesophilic Fe(III) reducers. Two organisms, Geothermobacter ehrlichii and archaeal strain 140, produced copious amounts of an exopolysaccharide material, which may have played an active role in the dissolution of the structural iron in SWa-1 smectite. The reduction of structural Fe(III) in SWa-1 by archaeal strain 140 was studied in detail. Microbial Fe(III) reduction was accompanied by an increase in interlayer and octahedral charges and some incorporation of potassium and magnesium into the smectite structure. However, these changes in the major element chemistry of SWa-1 smectite did not result in the formation of an illite-like structure, as reported for a mesophilic Fe(III) reducer. These results suggest that thermophilic Fe(III)-reducing organisms differ in their ability to reduce and solubilize structural Fe(III) in SWa-1 smectite and that SWa-1 is not easily transformed to illite by these organisms.},
	keywords = {Archaea, Bacteria, Ferric Compounds, Geologic Sediments, Hot Temperature, Oxidation-Reduction, Silicates},
	issn = {1098-5336},
	doi = {10.1128/AEM.01580-07},
	author = {Kashefi, Kazem and Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Elliott, W Crawford and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {508,
	title = {Geobacter pickeringii sp. nov., Geobacter argillaceus sp. nov. and Pelosinus fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from subsurface kaolin lenses.},
	journal = {Int J Syst Evol Microbiol},
	volume = {57},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Jan},
	pages = {126-35},
	abstract = {The goal of this project was to isolate representative Fe(III)-reducing bacteria from kaolin clays that may influence iron mineralogy in kaolin. Two novel dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacteria, strains G12(T) and G13(T), were isolated from sedimentary kaolin strata in Georgia (USA). Cells of strains G12(T) and G13(T) were motile, non-spore-forming regular rods, 1-2 mum long and 0.6 mum in diameter. Cells had one lateral flagellum. Phylogenetic analyses using the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the novel strains demonstrated their affiliation to the genus Geobacter. Strain G12(T) was most closely related to Geobacter pelophilus (94.7 \%) and Geobacter chapellei (94.1 \%). Strain G13(T) was most closely related to Geobacter grbiciae (95.3 \%) and Geobacter metallireducens (95.1 \%). Based on phylogenetic analyses and phenotypic differences between the novel isolates and other closely related species of the genus Geobacter, the isolates are proposed as representing two novel species, Geobacter argillaceus sp. nov. (type strain G12(T)=ATCC BAA-1139(T)=JCM 12999(T)) and Geobacter pickeringii sp. nov. (type strain G13(T)=ATCC BAA-1140(T)=DSM 17153(T)=JCM 13000(T)). Another isolate, strain R7(T), was derived from a primary kaolin deposit in Russia. The cells of strain R7(T) were motile, spore-forming, slightly curved rods, 0.6 x 2.0-6.0 microm in size and with up to six peritrichous flagella. Strain R7(T) was capable of reducing Fe(III) only in the presence of a fermentable substrate. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis demonstrated that this isolate is unique, showing less than 92 \% similarity to bacteria of the Sporomusa-Pectinatus-Selenomomas phyletic group, including {\textquoteright}Anaerospora hongkongensis{\textquoteright} (90.2 \%), Acetonema longum (90.6 \%), Dendrosporobacter quercicolus (90.9 \%) and Anaerosinus glycerini (91.5 \%). On the basis of phylogenetic analysis and physiological tests, strain R7(T) is proposed to represent a novel genus and species, Pelosinus fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov. (type strain R7(T)=DSM 17108(T)=ATCC BAA-1133(T)), in the Sporomusa-Pectinatus-Selenomonas group.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Typing Techniques, Base Composition, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Ferric Compounds, Genes, rRNA, Geobacter, Geologic Sediments, Georgia, Kaolin, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxidation-Reduction, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Russia, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Species Specificity},
	issn = {1466-5026},
	doi = {10.1099/ijs.0.64221-0},
	author = {Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Nevin, Kelly P and Blakeney-Hayward, Jessie D and Johnsen, Claudia V and Plaia, Todd W and Krader, Paul and Woodard, Trevor and Holmes, Dawn E and Vanpraagh, Catherine Gaw and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {525,
	title = {Genetic characterization of a single bifunctional enzyme for fumarate reduction and succinate oxidation in Geobacter sulfurreducens and engineering of fumarate reduction in Geobacter metallireducens.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {188},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Jan},
	pages = {450-5},
	abstract = {The mechanism of fumarate reduction in Geobacter sulfurreducens was investigated. The genome contained genes encoding a heterotrimeric fumarate reductase, FrdCAB, with homology to the fumarate reductase of Wolinella succinogenes and the succinate dehydrogenase of Bacillus subtilis. Mutation of the putative catalytic subunit of the enzyme resulted in a strain that lacked fumarate reductase activity and was unable to grow with fumarate as the terminal electron acceptor. The mutant strain also lacked succinate dehydrogenase activity and did not grow with acetate as the electron donor and Fe(III) as the electron acceptor. The mutant strain could grow with acetate as the electron donor and Fe(III) as the electron acceptor if fumarate was provided to alleviate the need for succinate dehydrogenase activity in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. The growth rate of the mutant strain under these conditions was faster and the cell yields were higher than for wild type grown under conditions requiring succinate dehydrogenase activity, suggesting that the succinate dehydrogenase reaction consumes energy. An orthologous frdCAB operon was present in Geobacter metallireducens, which cannot grow with fumarate as the terminal electron acceptor. When a putative dicarboxylic acid transporter from G. sulfurreducens was expressed in G. metallireducens, growth with fumarate as the sole electron acceptor was possible. These results demonstrate that, unlike previously described organisms, G. sulfurreducens and possibly G. metallireducens use the same enzyme for both fumarate reduction and succinate oxidation in vivo.},
	keywords = {Culture Media, Dicarboxylic Acids, Fumarates, Geobacter, Molecular Sequence Data, Operon, Oxidation-Reduction, Recombinant Proteins, Substrate Specificity, Succinate Dehydrogenase, Succinic Acid},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.188.2.450-455.2006},
	author = {Butler, Jessica E and Glaven, Richard H and Esteve-N{\'u}{\~n}ez, Abraham and N{\'u}{\~n}ez, Cinthia and Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Bond, Daniel R and Lovley, Derek R}
}
