@article {437,
	title = {Gene expression and deletion analysis of mechanisms for electron transfer from electrodes to Geobacter sulfurreducens.},
	journal = {Bioelectrochemistry},
	volume = {80},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011 Feb},
	pages = {142-50},
	abstract = {Geobacter sulfurreducens is one of the few microorganisms available in pure culture known to directly accept electrons from a negatively poised electrode. Microarray analysis was used to compare gene transcript abundance in biofilms of G. sulfurreducens using a graphite electrode as the sole electron donor for fumarate reduction compared with transcript abundance in biofilms growing on the same material, but not consuming current. Surprisingly, genes for putative cell-electrode connections, such as outer-surface cytochromes and pili, which are highly expressed in current-producing biofilms, were not highly expressed in current-consuming biofilms. Microarray analysis of G. sulfurreducens gene transcript abundance in current-consuming biofilms versus current-producing biofilms gave similar results. In both comparative studies current-consuming biofilms had greater transcript abundance for a gene (GSU3274) encoding a putative monoheme, c-type cytochrome. Deletion of genes for outer-surface proteins previously shown to be essential for optimal electron transfer to electrodes had no impact on electron transfer from electrodes. Deletion of GSU3274 completely inhibited electron transfer from electrodes, but had no impact on electron transfer to electrodes. These differences in gene expression patterns and the impact of gene deletions suggest that the mechanisms for electron transfer from electrodes to G. sulfurreducens differ significantly from the mechanisms for electron transfer to electrodes.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Biofilms, Cytochromes, Electrodes, Electron Transport, Electrons, Gene Expression, Geobacter, Graphite, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Oxidation-Reduction, Sequence Deletion},
	issn = {1878-562X},
	doi = {10.1016/j.bioelechem.2010.07.005},
	author = {Strycharz, Sarah M and Glaven, Richard H and Coppi, Maddalena V and Gannon, Sarah M and Perpetua, Lorrie A and Liu, Anna and Nevin, Kelly P and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {481,
	title = {Genome-wide gene expression patterns and growth requirements suggest that Pelobacter carbinolicus reduces Fe(III) indirectly via sulfide production.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {74},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Jul},
	pages = {4277-84},
	abstract = {Although Pelobacter species are closely related to Geobacter species, recent studies suggested that Pelobacter carbinolicus may reduce Fe(III) via a different mechanism because it lacks the outer-surface c-type cytochromes that are required for Fe(III) reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Investigation into the mechanisms for Fe(III) reduction demonstrated that P. carbinolicus had growth yields on both soluble and insoluble Fe(III) consistent with those of other Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. Comparison of whole-genome transcript levels during growth on Fe(III) versus fermentative growth demonstrated that the greatest apparent change in gene expression was an increase in transcript levels for four contiguous genes. These genes encode two putative periplasmic thioredoxins; a putative outer-membrane transport protein; and a putative NAD(FAD)-dependent dehydrogenase with homology to disulfide oxidoreductases in the N terminus, rhodanese (sulfurtransferase) in the center, and uncharacterized conserved proteins in the C terminus. Unlike G. sulfurreducens, transcript levels for cytochrome genes did not increase in P. carbinolicus during growth on Fe(III). P. carbinolicus could use sulfate as the sole source of sulfur during fermentative growth, but required elemental sulfur or sulfide for growth on Fe(III). The increased expression of genes potentially involved in sulfur reduction, coupled with the requirement for sulfur or sulfide during growth on Fe(III), suggests that P. carbinolicus reduces Fe(III) via an indirect mechanism in which (i) elemental sulfur is reduced to sulfide and (ii) the sulfide reduces Fe(III) with the regeneration of elemental sulfur. This contrasts with the direct reduction of Fe(III) that has been proposed for Geobacter species.},
	keywords = {Acetoin, Cytochrome c Group, Deltaproteobacteria, Ethanol, Fermentation, Ferric Compounds, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome, Bacterial, Iron, Nitrilotriacetic Acid, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Oxidation-Reduction, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA, Bacterial, Substrate Specificity, Sulfides, Sulfur, Sulfur-Reducing Bacteria, Thioredoxins},
	issn = {1098-5336},
	doi = {10.1128/AEM.02901-07},
	author = {Haveman, Shelley A and Didonato, Raymond J and Villanueva, Laura and Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Postier, Bradley L and Xu, Bo and Liu, Anna and Lovley, Derek R}
}
