@article {3062,
	title = {Stainless steel corrosion via direct iron-to-microbe electron transfer by Geobacter species.},
	journal = {ISME J},
	volume = {15},
	year = {2021},
	month = {2021 Oct},
	pages = {3084-3093},
	abstract = {<p>Microbial corrosion of iron-based materials is a substantial economic problem. A mechanistic understanding is required to develop mitigation strategies, but previous mechanistic studies have been limited to investigations with relatively pure Fe(0), which is not a common structural material. We report here that the mechanism for microbial corrosion of stainless steel, the metal of choice for many actual applications, can be significantly different from that~for Fe(0). Although H is often an intermediary electron carrier between the metal and microbes during Fe(0) corrosion, we found that H is not abiotically produced from stainless steel, making this corrosion mechanism unlikely. Geobacter sulfurreducens and Geobacter metallireducens, electrotrophs that are known to directly accept electrons from other microbes or electrodes, extracted electrons from stainless steel via direct iron-to-microbe electron transfer. Genetic modification to prevent H consumption did not negatively impact on stainless steel corrosion. Corrosion was inhibited when genes for outer-surface cytochromes that are key electrical contacts were deleted. These results indicate that a common model of microbial Fe(0) corrosion~by hydrogenase-positive microbes, in which H serves as an intermediary electron carrier between the metal surface and the microbe, may not apply to the microbial corrosion of stainless steel. However, direct iron-to-microbe electron transfer is a~feasible route for stainless steel corrosion.</p>},
	keywords = {Corrosion, Electrons, Geobacter, Iron, Stainless Steel},
	issn = {1751-7370},
	doi = {10.1038/s41396-021-00990-2},
	author = {Tang, Hai-Yan and Yang, Chuntian and Ueki, Toshiyuki and Pittman, Conor C and Xu, Dake and Woodard, Trevor L and Holmes, Dawn E and Gu, Tingyue and Wang, Fuhui and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {3077,
	title = {Iron Corrosion via Direct Metal-Microbe Electron Transfer.},
	journal = {mBio},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019 May 14},
	abstract = {<p>The concept that anaerobic microorganisms can directly accept electrons from Fe(0) has been controversial because direct metal-microbe electron transfer has previously only been indirectly inferred. Fe(0) oxidation was studied with  strain ACL, an autotrophic strain that was previously shown to grow with electrons derived from a graphite cathode as the sole electron donor. Strain ACL grew with Fe(0) as the sole electron donor and fumarate as the electron acceptor. However, it appeared that at least a portion of the electron transfer was via H produced nonenzymatically from the oxidation of Fe(0) to Fe(II). H, which accumulated in abiotic controls, was consumed during the growth of strain ACL, the cells were predominately planktonic, and genes for the uptake hydrogenase were highly expressed. Strain ACL was constructed to prevent growth on H or formate by deleting the genes for the uptake of hydrogenase and formate dehydrogenases from strain ACL. Strain ACL also grew with Fe(0) as the sole electron donor, but H accumulated in the culture, and cells heavily colonized Fe(0) surfaces with no visible planktonic growth. Transcriptomics suggested that the outer surface -type cytochromes OmcS and OmcZ were important during growth of strain ACL on Fe(0). Strain ACL did not grow on Fe(0) if the gene for either of these cytochromes was deleted. The specific attachment of strain ACL to Fe(0), coupled with requirements for known extracellular electrical contacts, suggest that direct metal-microbe electron transfer is the most likely option for Fe(0) serving as an electron donor. The anaerobic corrosion of iron structures is expensive to repair and can be a safety and environmental concern. It has been known for over 100 years that the presence of anaerobic respiratory microorganisms can accelerate iron corrosion. Multiple studies have suggested that there are sulfate reducers, methanogens, and acetogens that can directly accept electrons from Fe(0) to support sulfate or carbon dioxide reduction. However, all of the strains studied can also use H as an electron donor for growth, which is known to be abiotically produced from Fe(0). Furthermore, no proteins definitely shown to function as extracellular electrical contacts with Fe(0) were identified. The studies described here demonstrate that direct electron transfer from Fe(0) can support anaerobic respiration. They also map out a simple genetic approach to the study of iron corrosion mechanisms in other microorganisms. A better understanding of how microorganisms promote iron corrosion is expected to lead to the development of strategies that can help reduce adverse impacts from this process.</p>},
	keywords = {Anaerobiosis, Corrosion, Cytochromes, Electron Transport, Formate Dehydrogenases, Geobacter, Iron, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxidoreductases, Transcriptome},
	issn = {2150-7511},
	doi = {10.1128/mBio.00303-19},
	author = {Tang, Hai-Yan and Holmes, Dawn E and Ueki, Toshiyuki and Palacios, Paola A and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {488,
	title = {Gene transcript analysis of assimilatory iron limitation in Geobacteraceae during groundwater bioremediation.},
	journal = {Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 May},
	pages = {1218-30},
	abstract = {Limitations on the availability of Fe(III) as an electron acceptor are thought to play an important role in restricting the growth and activity of Geobacter species during bioremediation of contaminated subsurface environments, but the possibility that these organisms might also be limited in the subsurface by the availability of iron for assimilatory purposes was not previously considered because copious quantities of Fe(II) are produced as the result of Fe(III) reduction. Analysis of multiple Geobacteraceae genomes revealed the presence of a three-gene cluster consisting of homologues of two iron-dependent regulators, fur and dtxR (ideR), separated by a homologue of feoB, which encodes an Fe(II) uptake protein. This cluster appears to be conserved among members of the Geobacteraceae and was detected in several environments. Expression of the fur-feoB-ideR cluster decreased as Fe(II) concentrations increased in chemostat cultures. The number of Geobacteraceae feoB transcripts in groundwater samples from a site undergoing in situ uranium bioremediation was relatively high until the concentration of dissolved Fe(II) increased near the end of the field experiment. These results suggest that, because much of the Fe(II) is sequestered in solid phases, Geobacter species, which have a high requirement for iron for iron-sulfur proteins, may be limited by the amount of iron available for assimilatory purposes. These results demonstrate the ability of transcript analysis to reveal previously unsuspected aspects of the in situ physiology of microorganisms in subsurface environments.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Biodegradation, Environmental, Culture Media, Ferric Compounds, Ferrous Compounds, Fresh Water, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Geobacter, Iron, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Repressor Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transcription, Genetic, Uranium, Water Pollution, Radioactive},
	issn = {1462-2920},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01537.x},
	author = {O{\textquoteright}Neil, Regina A and Holmes, Dawn E and Coppi, Maddalena V and Adams, Lorrie A and Larrahondo, M Juliana and Ward, Joy E and Nevin, Kelly P and Woodard, Trevor L and Vrionis, Helen A and N{\textquoteright}guessan, Lucie A and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {569,
	title = {Thermophily in the Geobacteraceae: Geothermobacter ehrlichii gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel thermophilic member of the Geobacteraceae from the "Bag City" hydrothermal vent.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {69},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 May},
	pages = {2985-93},
	abstract = {Little is known about the microbiology of the "Bag City" hydrothermal vent, which is part of a new eruption site on the Juan de Fuca Ridge and which is notable for its accumulation of polysaccharide on the sediment surface. A pure culture, designated strain SS015, was recovered from a vent fluid sample from the Bag City site through serial dilution in liquid medium with malate as the electron donor and Fe(III) oxide as the electron acceptor and then isolation of single colonies on solid Fe(III) oxide medium. The cells were gram-negative rods, about 0.5 micro m by 1.2 to 1.5 micro m, and motile and contained c-type cytochromes. Analysis of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence of strain SS015 placed it in the family Geobacteraceae in the delta subclass of the Proteobacteria. Unlike previously described members of the Geobacteraceae, which are mesophiles, strain SS015 was a thermophile and grew at temperatures of between 35 and 65 degrees C, with an optimum temperature of 55 degrees C. Like many previously described members of the Geobacteraceae, strain SS015 grew with organic acids as the electron donors and Fe(III) or nitrate as the electron acceptor, with nitrate being reduced to ammonia. Strain SS015 was unique among the Geobacteraceae in its ability to use sugars, starch, or amino acids as electron donors for Fe(III) reduction. Under stress conditions, strain SS015 produced copious quantities of extracellular polysaccharide, providing a model for the microbial production of the polysaccharide accumulation at the Bag City site. The 16S rDNA sequence of strain SS015 was less than 94\% similar to the sequences of previously described members of the Geobacteraceae; this fact, coupled with its unique physiological properties, suggests that strain SS015 represents a new genus in the family Geobacteraceae. The name Geothermobacter ehrlichii gen. nov., sp. nov., is proposed (ATCC BAA-635 and DSM 15274). Although strains of Geobacteraceae are known to be the predominant Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in a variety of Fe(III)-reducing environments at moderate temperatures, strain SS015 represents the first described thermophilic member of the Geobacteraceae and thus extends the known environmental range of this family to hydrothermal environments.},
	keywords = {Base Composition, Cytochromes, Deltaproteobacteria, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Ecosystem, Electron Transport, Geologic Sediments, Hot Temperature, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Iron, Microscopy, Electron, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxidation-Reduction, Pacific Ocean, Phylogeny, Seawater, Sodium Chloride, Species Specificity},
	issn = {0099-2240},
	author = {Kashefi, Kazem and Holmes, Dawn E and Baross, John A and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {583,
	title = {Enrichment of members of the family Geobacteraceae associated with stimulation of dissimilatory metal reduction in uranium-contaminated aquifer sediments.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {68},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002 May},
	pages = {2300-6},
	abstract = {Stimulating microbial reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) shows promise as a strategy for immobilizing uranium in uranium-contaminated subsurface environments. In order to learn more about which microorganisms might be involved in U(VI) reduction in situ, the changes in the microbial community when U(VI) reduction was stimulated with the addition of acetate were monitored in sediments from three different uranium-contaminated sites in the floodplain of the San Juan River in Shiprock, N.Mex. In all three sediments U(VI) reduction was accompanied by concurrent Fe(III) reduction and a dramatic enrichment of microorganisms in the family Geobacteraceae, which are known U(VI)- and Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms. At the point when U(VI) reduction and Fe(III) reduction were nearing completion, Geobacteraceae accounted for ca. 40\% of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences recovered from the sediments with bacterial PCR primers, whereas Geobacteraceae accounted for fewer than 5\% of the 16S rDNA sequences in control sediments that were not amended with acetate and in which U(VI) and Fe(III) reduction were not stimulated. Between 55 and 65\% of these Geobacteraceae sequences were most similar to sequences from Desulfuromonas species, with the remainder being most closely related to Geobacter species. Quantitative analysis of Geobacteraceae sequences with most-probable-number PCR and TaqMan analyses indicated that the number of Geobacteraceae sequences increased from 2 to 4 orders of magnitude over the course of U(VI) and Fe(III) reduction in the acetate-amended sediments from the three sites. No increase in Geobacteraceae sequences was observed in control sediments. In contrast to the predominance of Geobacteraceae sequences, no sequences related to other known Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms were detected in sediments. These results compare favorably with an increasing number of studies which have demonstrated that Geobacteraceae are important components of the microbial community in a diversity of subsurface environments in which Fe(III) reduction is an important process. The combination of these results with the finding that U(VI) reduction takes place during Fe(III) reduction and prior to sulfate reduction suggests that Geobacteraceae will be responsible for much of the Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction during uranium bioremediation in these sediments.},
	keywords = {Gene Library, Geologic Sediments, Iron, Oxidation-Reduction, Proteobacteria, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Soil Pollutants, Uranium},
	issn = {0099-2240},
	author = {Holmes, Dawn E and Finneran, Kevin T and O{\textquoteright}Neil, Regina A and Lovley, Derek R}
}
