@article {437,
	title = {Gene expression and deletion analysis of mechanisms for electron transfer from electrodes to Geobacter sulfurreducens.},
	journal = {Bioelectrochemistry},
	volume = {80},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011 Feb},
	pages = {142-50},
	abstract = {Geobacter sulfurreducens is one of the few microorganisms available in pure culture known to directly accept electrons from a negatively poised electrode. Microarray analysis was used to compare gene transcript abundance in biofilms of G. sulfurreducens using a graphite electrode as the sole electron donor for fumarate reduction compared with transcript abundance in biofilms growing on the same material, but not consuming current. Surprisingly, genes for putative cell-electrode connections, such as outer-surface cytochromes and pili, which are highly expressed in current-producing biofilms, were not highly expressed in current-consuming biofilms. Microarray analysis of G. sulfurreducens gene transcript abundance in current-consuming biofilms versus current-producing biofilms gave similar results. In both comparative studies current-consuming biofilms had greater transcript abundance for a gene (GSU3274) encoding a putative monoheme, c-type cytochrome. Deletion of genes for outer-surface proteins previously shown to be essential for optimal electron transfer to electrodes had no impact on electron transfer from electrodes. Deletion of GSU3274 completely inhibited electron transfer from electrodes, but had no impact on electron transfer to electrodes. These differences in gene expression patterns and the impact of gene deletions suggest that the mechanisms for electron transfer from electrodes to G. sulfurreducens differ significantly from the mechanisms for electron transfer to electrodes.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Biofilms, Cytochromes, Electrodes, Electron Transport, Electrons, Gene Expression, Geobacter, Graphite, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Oxidation-Reduction, Sequence Deletion},
	issn = {1878-562X},
	doi = {10.1016/j.bioelechem.2010.07.005},
	author = {Strycharz, Sarah M and Glaven, Richard H and Coppi, Maddalena V and Gannon, Sarah M and Perpetua, Lorrie A and Liu, Anna and Nevin, Kelly P and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {525,
	title = {Genetic characterization of a single bifunctional enzyme for fumarate reduction and succinate oxidation in Geobacter sulfurreducens and engineering of fumarate reduction in Geobacter metallireducens.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {188},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Jan},
	pages = {450-5},
	abstract = {The mechanism of fumarate reduction in Geobacter sulfurreducens was investigated. The genome contained genes encoding a heterotrimeric fumarate reductase, FrdCAB, with homology to the fumarate reductase of Wolinella succinogenes and the succinate dehydrogenase of Bacillus subtilis. Mutation of the putative catalytic subunit of the enzyme resulted in a strain that lacked fumarate reductase activity and was unable to grow with fumarate as the terminal electron acceptor. The mutant strain also lacked succinate dehydrogenase activity and did not grow with acetate as the electron donor and Fe(III) as the electron acceptor. The mutant strain could grow with acetate as the electron donor and Fe(III) as the electron acceptor if fumarate was provided to alleviate the need for succinate dehydrogenase activity in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. The growth rate of the mutant strain under these conditions was faster and the cell yields were higher than for wild type grown under conditions requiring succinate dehydrogenase activity, suggesting that the succinate dehydrogenase reaction consumes energy. An orthologous frdCAB operon was present in Geobacter metallireducens, which cannot grow with fumarate as the terminal electron acceptor. When a putative dicarboxylic acid transporter from G. sulfurreducens was expressed in G. metallireducens, growth with fumarate as the sole electron acceptor was possible. These results demonstrate that, unlike previously described organisms, G. sulfurreducens and possibly G. metallireducens use the same enzyme for both fumarate reduction and succinate oxidation in vivo.},
	keywords = {Culture Media, Dicarboxylic Acids, Fumarates, Geobacter, Molecular Sequence Data, Operon, Oxidation-Reduction, Recombinant Proteins, Substrate Specificity, Succinate Dehydrogenase, Succinic Acid},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.188.2.450-455.2006},
	author = {Butler, Jessica E and Glaven, Richard H and Esteve-N{\'u}{\~n}ez, Abraham and N{\'u}{\~n}ez, Cinthia and Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Bond, Daniel R and Lovley, Derek R}
}
