@article {488,
	title = {Gene transcript analysis of assimilatory iron limitation in Geobacteraceae during groundwater bioremediation.},
	journal = {Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 May},
	pages = {1218-30},
	abstract = {Limitations on the availability of Fe(III) as an electron acceptor are thought to play an important role in restricting the growth and activity of Geobacter species during bioremediation of contaminated subsurface environments, but the possibility that these organisms might also be limited in the subsurface by the availability of iron for assimilatory purposes was not previously considered because copious quantities of Fe(II) are produced as the result of Fe(III) reduction. Analysis of multiple Geobacteraceae genomes revealed the presence of a three-gene cluster consisting of homologues of two iron-dependent regulators, fur and dtxR (ideR), separated by a homologue of feoB, which encodes an Fe(II) uptake protein. This cluster appears to be conserved among members of the Geobacteraceae and was detected in several environments. Expression of the fur-feoB-ideR cluster decreased as Fe(II) concentrations increased in chemostat cultures. The number of Geobacteraceae feoB transcripts in groundwater samples from a site undergoing in situ uranium bioremediation was relatively high until the concentration of dissolved Fe(II) increased near the end of the field experiment. These results suggest that, because much of the Fe(II) is sequestered in solid phases, Geobacter species, which have a high requirement for iron for iron-sulfur proteins, may be limited by the amount of iron available for assimilatory purposes. These results demonstrate the ability of transcript analysis to reveal previously unsuspected aspects of the in situ physiology of microorganisms in subsurface environments.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Biodegradation, Environmental, Culture Media, Ferric Compounds, Ferrous Compounds, Fresh Water, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Geobacter, Iron, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Repressor Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transcription, Genetic, Uranium, Water Pollution, Radioactive},
	issn = {1462-2920},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01537.x},
	author = {O{\textquoteright}Neil, Regina A and Holmes, Dawn E and Coppi, Maddalena V and Adams, Lorrie A and Larrahondo, M Juliana and Ward, Joy E and Nevin, Kelly P and Woodard, Trevor L and Vrionis, Helen A and N{\textquoteright}guessan, Lucie A and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {501,
	title = {Lack of electricity production by Pelobacter carbinolicus indicates that the capacity for Fe(III) oxide reduction does not necessarily confer electron transfer ability to fuel cell anodes.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {73},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Aug},
	pages = {5347-53},
	abstract = {The ability of Pelobacter carbinolicus to oxidize electron donors with electron transfer to the anodes of microbial fuel cells was evaluated because microorganisms closely related to Pelobacter species are generally abundant on the anodes of microbial fuel cells harvesting electricity from aquatic sediments. P. carbinolicus could not produce current in a microbial fuel cell with electron donors which support Fe(III) oxide reduction by this organism. Current was produced using a coculture of P. carbinolicus and Geobacter sulfurreducens with ethanol as the fuel. Ethanol consumption was associated with the transitory accumulation of acetate and hydrogen. G. sulfurreducens alone could not metabolize ethanol, suggesting that P. carbinolicus grew in the fuel cell by converting ethanol to hydrogen and acetate, which G. sulfurreducens oxidized with electron transfer to the anode. Up to 83\% of the electrons available in ethanol were recovered as electricity and in the metabolic intermediate acetate. Hydrogen consumption by G. sulfurreducens was important for ethanol metabolism by P. carbinolicus. Confocal microscopy and analysis of 16S rRNA genes revealed that half of the cells growing on the anode surface were P. carbinolicus, but there was a nearly equal number of planktonic cells of P. carbinolicus. In contrast, G. sulfurreducens was primarily attached to the anode. P. carbinolicus represents the first Fe(III) oxide-reducing microorganism found to be unable to produce current in a microbial fuel cell, providing the first suggestion that the mechanisms for extracellular electron transfer to Fe(III) oxides and fuel cell anodes may be different.},
	keywords = {Bacteriological Techniques, Deltaproteobacteria, Electricity, Electron Transport, Ferrous Compounds, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Confocal, Oxidation-Reduction, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S},
	issn = {0099-2240},
	doi = {10.1128/AEM.00804-07},
	author = {Richter, Hanno and Lanthier, Martin and Nevin, Kelly P and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {586,
	title = {Geobacter metallireducens accesses insoluble Fe(III) oxide by chemotaxis.},
	journal = {Nature},
	volume = {416},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002 Apr 18},
	pages = {767-9},
	abstract = {Microorganisms that use insoluble Fe(III) oxide as an electron acceptor can have an important function in the carbon and nutrient cycles of aquatic sediments and in the bioremediation of organic and metal contaminants in groundwater. Although Fe(III) oxides are often abundant, Fe(III)-reducing microbes are faced with the problem of how to access effectively an electron acceptor that can not diffuse to the cell. Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in the genus Shewanella have resolved this problem by releasing soluble quinones that can carry electrons from the cell surface to Fe(III) oxide that is at a distance from the cell. Here we report that another Fe(III)-reducer, Geobacter metallireducens, has an alternative strategy for accessing Fe(III) oxides. Geobacter metallireducens specifically expresses flagella and pili only when grown on insoluble Fe(III) or Mn(IV) oxide, and is chemotactic towards Fe(II) and Mn(II) under these conditions. These results suggest that G. metallireducens senses when soluble electron acceptors are depleted and then synthesizes the appropriate appendages to permit it to search for, and establish contact with, insoluble Fe(III) or Mn(IV) oxide. This approach to the use of an insoluble electron acceptor may explain why Geobacter species predominate over other Fe(III) oxide-reducing microorganisms in a wide variety of sedimentary environments.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Chemotaxis, Deltaproteobacteria, DNA-Binding Proteins, Ferric Compounds, Ferrous Compounds, Fimbriae Proteins, Fimbriae, Bacterial, Flagella, Manganese Compounds, Movement, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxides, Solubility},
	issn = {0028-0836},
	doi = {10.1038/416767a},
	author = {Childers, Susan E and Ciufo, Stacy and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {577,
	title = {Multiple influences of nitrate on uranium solubility during bioremediation of uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments.},
	journal = {Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002 Sep},
	pages = {510-6},
	abstract = {Microbiological reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) has been proposed as a remediation strategy for uranium-contaminated groundwater. Nitrate is a common co-contaminant with uranium. Nitrate inhibited U(VI) reduction in acetate-amended aquifer sediments collected from a uranium-contaminated site in New Mexico. Once nitrate was depleted, both U(VI) and Fe(III) were reduced concurrently. When nitrate was added to sediments in which U(VI) had been reduced, U(VI) reappeared in solution. Parallel studies with the dissimilatory Fe(III)-, U(VI)- and nitrate-reducing microorganism, Geobacter metallireducens, demonstrated that nitrate inhibited reduction of Fe(III) and U(VI) in cell suspensions of cells that had been grown with nitrate as the electron acceptor, but not in Fe(III)-grown cells. Suspensions of nitrate-grown G. metallireducens oxidized Fe(II) and U(IV) with nitrate as the electron acceptor. U(IV) oxidation was accelerated when Fe(II) was also added, presumably due to the Fe(III) being formed abiotically oxidizing U(IV). These studies demonstrate that although the presence of nitrate is not likely to be an impediment to the bioremediation of uranium contamination with microbial U(VI) reduction, it is necessary to reduce nitrate before U(VI) can be reduced. These results also suggest that anaerobic oxidation of U(IV) to U(VI) with nitrate serving as the electron acceptor may provide a novel strategy for solubilizing and extracting microbial U(IV) precipitates from the subsurface.},
	keywords = {Ferric Compounds, Ferrous Compounds, Geologic Sediments, Nitrates, Oxidation-Reduction, Proteobacteria, Soil Pollutants, Solubility, Uranium, Water Pollutants, Chemical},
	issn = {1462-2912},
	author = {Finneran, Kevin T and Housewright, Meghan E and Lovley, Derek R}
}
