@article {32,
	title = {Transcription regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 gene by the Ino2p and Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix proteins.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {83},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012 Jan},
	pages = {395-407},
	abstract = {<p>The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 gene product accounts for a majority of the acid phosphatase activity. Its expression is induced by the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein, Pho4p, in response to phosphate depletion. Pho4p binds predominantly to two UAS elements (UASp1 at -356 and UASp2 at -247) in the PHO5 promoter. Previous studies from our lab have shown cross-regulation of different biological processes by bHLH proteins. This study tested the ability of all yeast bHLH proteins to regulate PHO5 expression and identified inositol-mediated regulation via the Ino2p/Ino4p bHLH proteins. Ino2p/Ino4p are known regulators of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Genetic epistasis experiments showed that regulation by inositol required a third UAS site (UASp3 at -194). ChIP assays showed that Ino2p:Ino4p bind the PHO5 promoter and that this binding is dependent on Pho4p binding. These results demonstrate that phospholipid biosynthesis is co-ordinated with phosphate utilization via the bHLH proteins.</p>
},
	keywords = {Acid Phosphatase, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, DNA, Fungal, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Inositol, Models, Biological, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07941.x},
	author = {He, Ying and Swaminathan, Aishwarya and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {31,
	title = {Derepression of INO1 transcription requires cooperation between the Ino2p-Ino4p heterodimer and Cbf1p and recruitment of the ISW2 chromatin-remodeling complex.},
	journal = {Eukaryot Cell},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 Dec},
	pages = {1845-55},
	abstract = {<p>The Saccharomyces cerevisiae INO1 gene encodes the structural enzyme inositol-3-phosphate synthase for the synthesis de novo of inositol and inositol-containing phospholipids. The transcription of INO1 is completely derepressed in the absence of inositol and choline (I(-) C(-)). Derepression requires the binding of the Ino2p-Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) heterodimer to the UAS(INO) promoter element. We report here the requirement of a third bHLH protein, centromere-binding factor 1 (Cbf1p), for the complete derepression of INO1 transcription. We found that Cbf1p regulates INO1 transcription by binding to sites distal to the INO1 promoter and encompassing the upstream SNA3 open reading frame (ORF) and promoter. The binding of Cbf1p requires Ino2p-Ino4p binding to the UAS(INO) sites in the INO1 promoter and vice versa, suggesting a cooperative mechanism. Furthermore, Cbf1p binding to the upstream sites was required for the binding of the ISW2 chromatin-remodeling complex to the Ino2p-Ino4p-binding sites on the INO1 promoter. Consistent with this, ISW2 was also required for the complete derepression of INO1 transcription.</p>
},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Chromatin, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Dimerization, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1535-9786},
	doi = {10.1128/EC.00144-10},
	author = {Shetty, Ameet and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {36,
	title = {Transcriptional regulation of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes.},
	journal = {Biochim Biophys Acta},
	volume = {1771},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Mar},
	pages = {310-21},
	abstract = {The last several years have been witness to significant developments in understanding transcriptional regulation of the yeast phospholipid structural genes. The response of most phospholipid structural genes to inositol is now understood on a mechanistic level. The roles of specific activators and repressors are also well established. The knowledge of specific regulatory factors that bind the promoters of phospholipid structural genes serves as a foundation for understanding the role of chromatin modification complexes. Collectively, these findings present a complex picture for transcriptional regulation of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes. The INO1 gene is an ideal example of the complexity of transcriptional control and continues to serve as a model for studying transcription in general. Furthermore, transcription of the regulatory genes is also subject to complex and essential regulation. In addition, databases resulting from a plethora of genome-wide studies have identified regulatory signals that control one of the essential phospholipid biosynthetic genes, PIS1. These databases also provide significant clues for other regulatory signals that may affect phospholipid biosynthesis. Here, we have tried to present a complete summary of the transcription factors and mechanisms that regulate the phospholipid biosynthetic genes.},
	keywords = {CDP-Diacylglycerol-Inositol 3-Phosphatidyltransferase, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Intramolecular Lyases, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Phospholipids, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Yeasts},
	issn = {0006-3002},
	doi = {10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.05.017},
	author = {Chen, Meng and Hancock, Leandria C and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {38,
	title = {Analysis of Opi1p repressor mutants.},
	journal = {Curr Genet},
	volume = {49},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Jan},
	pages = {30-8},
	abstract = {Opi1p is the only known repressor protein specific to the phospholipid biosynthetic pathway. Opi1p is required for repression in response to inositol and choline supplementation. However, the mechanism of Opi1p repression is not completely understood. In part, this is because previously identified opi1 mutants contained nonsense mutations and thus provided little insight into the mechanism of Opi1p function. We have recently reported isolating novel opi1 mutants (rum and dim mutants) that contain missense mutations. Here, we show that these opi1 mutants produce Opi1p product at levels comparable to a wild-type strain. However, these mutants mis-regulate expression of two target genes, INO2-HIS3 and INO1-lacZ, and are also defective in autoregulation. An opi1-S339F mutant is particularly interesting because it completely eliminated autoregulation, but only abated regulation of an INO1-lacZ reporter. Two of the mutations in OPI1 (V343Q and S339F) provide genetic evidence for an interaction between Opi1p and the Ino2p activator since they reside in a region of Opi1p recently shown to interact with Ino2p in vitro. A third mutation (L252F) resides in a region of Opi1p with no known function.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Conserved Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Missense, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0172-8083},
	doi = {10.1007/s00294-005-0021-6},
	author = {Kaadige, Mohan R and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {41,
	title = {Identification of novel dominant INO2c mutants with an Opi- phenotype.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {52},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Jun},
	pages = {1271-80},
	abstract = {The INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for derepression of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes in response to inositol depletion. Conversely, the OPI1 gene is required for repression in response to inositol supplementation. Results of an in vitro assay have led to a model in which Opi1p interacts with Ino2p. However, there is no in vivo evidence to support this model. Additionally, most of the previously isolated ino2 mutants offer little insight into this model. Here, we report the isolation of a new class of dominant mutations in the INO2 gene, which yield constitutive expression of a target gene (i.e. an Opi(-) mutant phenotype). Two mutations reside in a region of the Ino2p required for interaction with Opi1p in vitro. Three other mutations are at the amino-terminus in a transcriptional activation domain.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Inositol, Mutation, Phenotype, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04069.x},
	author = {Gardenour, Kyle R and Levy, Jamie and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {43,
	title = {Opi1p, Ume6p and Sin3p control expression from the promoter of the INO2 regulatory gene via a novel regulatory cascade.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {48},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 May},
	pages = {823-32},
	abstract = {The INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for expression of most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes. INO2 expression is regulated by a complex cascade that includes autoregulation, Opi1p-mediated repression and Ume6p-mediated activation. To screen for mutants with altered INO2 expression directly, we constructed an INO2-HIS3 reporter that provides a plate assay for INO2 promoter activity. This reporter was used to isolate mutants (dim1) that fail to repress expression of the INO2 gene in an otherwise wild-type strain. The dim1 mutants contain mutations in the OPI1 gene. To define further the mechanism for Ume6p regulation of INO2 expression, we isolated suppressors (rum1, 2, 3) of the ume6Delta mutation that overexpress the INO2-HIS3 gene. Two of the rum mutant groups contain mutations in the OPI1 and SIN3 genes showing that opi1 and sin3 mutations are epistatic to the ume6Delta mutation. These results are surprising given that Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p are known to form a complex that represses the expression of a diverse set of yeast genes. This prompted us to examine the effect of sin3Delta and rpd3Delta mutants on INO2-cat expression. Surprisingly, the sin3Delta allele overexpressed INO2-cat, whereas the rpd3Delta mutant had no effect. We also show that the UME6 gene does not affect the expression of an OPI1-cat reporter. This suggests that Ume6p does not regulate INO2 expression indirectly by regulating OPI1 expression.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Regulator, Genes, Reporter, Genetic Complementation Test, Histone Deacetylases, Methyltransferases, Phenotype, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Kaadige, Mohan R and Lopes, John M}
}
