@article {836,
	title = {Differential suppression of priA2::kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {143},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996 May},
	pages = {5-13},
	abstract = {First identified as an essential component of the phi X174 in vitro DNA replication system, PriA has ATPase, helicase, translocase, and primosome-assembly activities. priA1::kan strains of Escherichia coli are sensitive to UV irradiation, deficient in homologous recombination following transduction, and filamentous. priA2::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression than wild type. We show that (1) priA1::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression, (2) priA2::kan strains are UVS and Rec-, (3) lexA3 suppresses the high basal levels of SOS expression of a priA2::kan strain, and (4) plasmid-encoded priA300 (K230R), a mutant allele retaining only the primosome-assembly activity of priA+, restores both UVR and Rec+ phenotypes to a priA2::kan strain. Finally, we have isolated 17 independent UVR Rec+ revertants of priA2::kan strains that carry extragenic suppressors. All 17 map in the C-terminal half of the dnaC gene. DnaC loads the DnaB helicase onto DNA as a prelude for primosome assembly and DNA replication. We conclude that priA{\textquoteright}s primosome-assembly activity is essential for DNA repair and recombination and that the dnaC suppressor mutations allow these processes to occur in the absence of priA.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophage phi X 174, beta-Galactosidase, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Bacterial, Genetic Markers, Mutagenesis, Phenotype, Recombination, Genetic, Replication Protein A, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, Suppression, Genetic, Transduction, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Samra, H S and Clark, A J}
}
@article {838,
	title = {recO and recR mutations delay induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {Mol Gen Genet},
	volume = {246},
	year = {1995},
	month = {1995 Jan 20},
	pages = {254-8},
	abstract = {RecF, RecO and RecR, three of the important proteins of the RecF pathway of recombination, are also needed for repair of DNA damage due to UV irradiation. recF mutants are not proficient in cleaving LexA repressor in vivo following DNA damage: therefore they show a delay of induction of the SOS response. In this communication, by measuring the in vivo levels of LexA repressor using anti-LexA antibodies, we show that recO and recR mutant strains are also not proficient in LexA cleavage reactions. In addition, we show that recO and recR mutations delay induction of beta-galactosidase activity expressed from a lexA-regulated promoter following exposure of cells to UV, thus further supporting the idea that recF, recO and recR gene products are needed for induction of the SOS response.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, beta-Galactosidase, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0026-8925},
	author = {Hegde, S and Sandler, S J and Clark, A J and Madiraju, M V}
}
@article {841,
	title = {RecOR suppression of recF mutant phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {176},
	year = {1994},
	month = {1994 Jun},
	pages = {3661-72},
	abstract = {The recF, recO, and recR genes form the recFOR epistasis group for DNA repair. recF mutants are sensitive to UV irradiation and fail to properly induce the SOS response. Using plasmid derivatives that overexpress combinations of the recO+ and recR+ genes, we tested the hypothesis that high-level expression of recO+ and recR+ (recOR) in vivo will indirectly suppress the recF mutant phenotypes mentioned above. We found that overexpression of just recR+ from the plasmid will partially suppress both phenotypes. Expression of the chromosomal recO+ gene is essential for the recR+ suppression. Hence we call this RecOR suppression of recF mutant phenotypes. RecOR suppression of SOS induction is more efficient with recO+ expression from a plasmid than with recO+ expression from the chromosome. This is not true for RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity (the two are equal). Comparison of RecOR suppression with the suppression caused by recA801 and recA803 shows that RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity is more effective than recA803 suppression and that RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity, like recA801 suppression, requires recJ+. We present a model that explains the data and proposes a function for the recFOR epistasis group in the induction of the SOS response and recombinational DNA repair.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Epistasis, Genetic, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenotype, Plasmids, SOS Response (Genetics), Suppression, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Clark, A J}
}
@article {843,
	title = {Use of high and low level overexpression plasmids to test mutant alleles of the recF gene of Escherichia coli K-12 for partial activity.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {135},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993 Nov},
	pages = {643-54},
	abstract = {We showed that sufficient overexpression of the wild-type recF gene interfered with three normal cell functions: (1) UV induction of transcription from the LexA-protein-repressed sulA promoter, (2) UV resistance and (3) cell viability at 42 degrees. To show this, we altered a low-level overexpressing recF+ plasmid with a set of structurally neutral mutations that increased the rate of expression of recF. The resulting high-level overexpressing plasmid interfered with UV induction of the sulA promoter, as did the low-level overexpressing plasmid. It also reduced UV resistance more than its low level progenitor and decreased viability at 42 degrees, an effect not seen with the low-level plasmid. We used the high-level plasmid to test four recF structural mutations for residual activity. The structural alleles consisted of an insertion mutation, two single amino acid substitution mutations and a double amino acid substitution mutation. On the Escherichia coli chromosome the three substitution mutations acted similarly to a recF deletion in reducing UV resistance in a recB21 recC22 sbcB15 sbcC201 genetic background. By this test, therefore, all three appeared to be null alleles. Measurements of conjugational recombination revealed, however, that the three substitution mutations may have residual activity. On the high-level overexpressing plasmid all three substitution mutations definitely showed partial activity. By contrast, the insertion mutation on the high-level overexpressing plasmid showed no partial activity and can be considered a true null mutation. One of the substitutions, recF143, showed a property attributable to a leaky mutation. Another substitution, recF4101, may block selectively two of the three interference phenotypes, thus allowing us to infer a mechanism for them.},
	keywords = {Alleles, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression, Genes, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Mutation, Phenotype, Plasmids, Radiation Tolerance, Recombination, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Clark, A J}
}
